Comparison of Endodontic Postoperative Pain Using Different Irrigation Systems

NCT06358833 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 108

Last updated 2026-05-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Summary:

After a root canal procedure, it is common to experience postoperative pain. Cleaning the root canal thoroughly is crucial for pain relief, but removing all debris with standard methods is difficult. Irrigation, using either traditional endodontic needles or newer methods like endodontic activation, helps clean the canal. This study aims to compare pain levels after using conventional needles versus an Endo1 Ultrasonic Endo Activate Device for irrigation. Patients will undergo standard root canal preparation and then be randomly assigned to one of two groups for final irrigation: the Endo1 device (EA) and the conventional endodontic needles (EN). The study will provide insights into which method is more effective in reducing postoperative pain.

Conditions

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Irreversible Pulpitis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

endodontic needle (EN)

the irrigation of root canals will be done with 2.5 % sodium hypochlorite. The delivery of the irrigant will be done using 27G side-vented endodontic irrigation needles (Omega, Inc). The tip of the needle will be pre-measured and positioned within 1 millimeter of the working length. No activation of the irrigant will be performed.

PROCEDURE

Endodontic activation (EA)

the irrigation of root canals will be done with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. The delivery of the irrigant will be done using 27G side-vented endodontic irrigation needles (Omega, Inc). The irrigant will be activated with ultrasonic energy using the Endo-1 Ultrasonic Endo Activator (Guilin Woodpecker, Guilin, China). The tip of the Endo-1 Ultrasonic Endo Activator device will be pre-measured and kept within 1 mm from the working length. The manufacturer's instructions regarding irrigant activation will be followed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Qassim University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Muhammad Zubair Ahmad, FCPS · Qassim University, Saudi Arabia

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-15
Primary Completion
2025-04-30
Completion
2025-04-30

Countries

  • Saudi Arabia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06358833 on ClinicalTrials.gov