A Split-Blind Clinical Investigation to Compare the Performance and Safety of Inion GTR™ Biodegradable Membrane System to Resorbable Bilayer Bio-Gide®-Membrane of Geistlich Biomaterials in Enhancing Bone Regeneration After Removal of Wisdom Teeth.
NCT00727818 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Last updated 2008-08-04
Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate by histology and histomorphometry, thirty human osseous biopsies sampled from fifteen patients (2 biopsies per patient) following 3 months of implantation. This study is part of a splitting-blind clinical investigation to compare the performance and safety of INION GTRTM Biodegradable Membrane System to resorbable bilayer Bio-Gide®-membrane of Geistlich biomaterials in enhancing bone regeneration after removal of wisdom teeth.
The bone defect and alveolar cavity were augmented with Spongostan® dental 1x1x1cm, Johnson \& Johnson, Spreitenbach, Switzerland. The extraction sites were covered on one side with an INION GTRTM Biodegradable Membrane System and on the other with Geistlich resorbable bilayer Bio-Gide®-membrane.
This study was conducted in adaptation to the ISO 10993 Standard : Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices, Part 6 (2007): Tests for Local Effects after Implantation.
This study was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the FDA (Department of health and human services) Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Regulations, 21 CFR 58 (revised as of April 01, 2005) and in accordance with the requirements of the OECD Good Laboratory Practices, reference ENV/MC/CHEM (98) 17, adapted by council on November 26th 1997.
* Trial with medical device
Conditions
- Bone Regeneration Following Wisdom Teeth Extraction
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
guided bone regeneration
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Inion Oy
collaborator INDUSTRY -
University of Zurich
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
01 Studienregister MasterAdmins · UniversitaetsSpital Zuerich
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2006-05-31
- Completion
- 2007-02-28
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Biomaterial to Counteract Ridge Reduction Following the Removal of Multiple Adjacent Teeth.
NCT02903667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using Synthetic Membrane
NCT01654627 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Adjunctive Use of Polynucleotide and Hyaluronic Acid-based Gel in Alveolar Preservation After Tooth Extraction
NCT06633211 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hyaluronic Acid and Polynucleotides for Supra-bony Defects
NCT06309719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Using Xenogenic Bone Graft and Pre-hydrated Collagen Membrane
NCT04955873 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium Reinforced d-PTFE Membrane Versus Collagen Membrane For Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT05426616 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Lando® Absorbable Collagen Membrane in Oral Bone Repair
NCT03464786 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dehydrated Human Amnion-Chorion and Type 1 Bovine Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT03290638 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration With Customized Titanium Meshes
NCT04480073 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Periodontal Intra-bony Defects With a Volume Stable Collagen Matrix or Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral With 10% Collagen
NCT06676826 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Peri Implant Soft Tissue Healing in Single Implant Restoration Using Two Different Techniques
NCT02513368 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparing the Efficacy and Morbidity of Two Vertical Ridge Augmentation Techniques
NCT02703480 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hyaluronic Acid and Polynucleotides in Ridge Preservation
NCT07099846 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Behavior in Maxillary Post-extractive Sites Treated With Guided Bone Regeneration (G.B.R.) Techniques in Alveolar Socket Preservation (A.S.P.) Procedures With Different Autologous and Heterologous Biomaterials.
NCT07269990 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparative Volumetric Assessment of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing Different Bone Grafting Materials
NCT02532543 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance and Safety of Lyoplant® in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) in Oral Surgery
NCT06732167 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Regeneration of Alveolar Sockets With rhBMP-2-loaded Bovine Bone Mineral
NCT05717478 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Volumetric Analysis of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing for Ridge Preservation and Socket Seal After Tooth Extraction
NCT02844569 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes
NCT04332679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Straumann BoneCeramic vs. Allograft Bone in Extraction Sockets
NCT00782236 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Regeneration of Intrabony Defects With Nano Hydroxyapatite Graft, and Periosteum as Barrier Membrane Under Magnification
NCT04195295 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Healing with Hyaluronic Acid After Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT04467736 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration With Custom Made Meshes
NCT04942223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Platelet-rich Fibrin and Autogenous Bone vs Enamel Matrix Derivative and Autogenous Bone in Intrabony Defects
NCT03510780 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Different Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques
NCT02482987 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA