MedTrace Logo

WFP Cash, Food, and Voucher Study in Ecuador

NCT02526147 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2580

Last updated 2015-08-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This evaluation is part of a five country project to evaluate the benefits and costs of the use of two alternatives to food transfers: vouchers and cash (hereafter referred to as "alternative modalities"). The project will generate information on how outcomes such as household food expenditure and dietary diversity, relevant to both beneficiaries and WFP, change following the introduction of these alternative modalities; how benefits and costs of these are, relative to food transfers, distributed across and within households; and what are the critical operational issues that need to be addressed for these alternatives to be successfully implemented. More specifically, the project will answer seven questions:

1. Do households benefit from receipt of the alternative modalities?
2. Are these benefits greater, or less, when transfers are made using alternative modalities compared to food transfers. How does this vary across outcomes (such as nutrition, livelihoods, gender dynamics and intra-household resource allocation) that are of especial interest to WFP?
3. How does the distribution of benefits differ across households when transfers are made using alternative modalities compared to food transfers?
4. How does the distribution of benefits differ within households when transfers are made using alternative modalities compared to food transfers? Do certain household members (women, young children) benefit more from one type of modality? How do these modalities affect decision-making processes within the household?
5. Why are these differences observed? How do the reasons for these differences affect the study's ability to generalize from these evaluations?
6. Does the delivery of alternative modalities cost less than food transfers? What accounts for these cost differences? Are some costs (such as transport) really lower or are they transferred to beneficiaries? Within the household, who bears these additional costs?
7. What is the benefit: cost ratios associated with these different modalities from the perspective of WFP? Is there a conflict between the modality "preferred" by WFP and the modality "preferred" by beneficiaries?

These objectives will be accomplished through household survey data collection among a panel of households before and after transfer of alternative modalities. In addition, select countries will involve the collection of anthropometric, biomarker and cognitive testing.

Conditions

  • Food Security

Interventions

OTHER

Cash

OTHER

Voucher

OTHER

Food

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • World Food Program

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • International Food Policy Research Institute

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Melissa L Hidrobo, PhD · IFPRI

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-04-30
Primary Completion
2011-11-30
Completion
2011-11-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02526147 on ClinicalTrials.gov