Interval Versus Continuous Training in Heart Failure

NCT02448147 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2015-05-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

BACKGROUND: The physiopathology of the heart failure involves compensatory mechanisms as exacerbated neurohormonal activity, endothelial dysfunction and consequently the muscle disability and exercise intolerance. The interval exercise training has been proposed as one efficient method to heart failure patients. It seems that the main mechanism involved in the benefit of the interval exercise training is "shear stress". AIM: To study the interval exercise training versus the continuous exercise training in the sympathetic activity and in the peripheral muscle perfusion in heart failure patients. Moreover, we will evaluate the muscle apoptosis, microRNA in plasma and muscle biopsy, biomarkers levels of inflammation, quality of life and exercise capacity. METODOLOGY: Will be selected 40 patients (male and female) with age between 30 and 60 years, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% and functional class I, II and III. These patients will be randomized into three groups: Interval (AIT), continuous (MCT) and control (CG). All patients will be evaluated with microneurography, peripheral muscle perfusion, muscle biopsy, blood samples, accelerometer, cardiopulmonary exercise test and quality of life before and after end of the period of 03 (three) months.

Conditions

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Interval training

Patients will be submitted to three months aerobic exercise training, three times per week. Each session will have two levels of intensity: one minute at respiratory compensation point heart rate intercalating with two minutes at anaerobic threshold heart rate during thirty minutes.

BEHAVIORAL

Continuous training

Patients will be submitted to three months aerobic exercise training, three times per week. Each session will have only one level of intensity during stimulus phase of exercise, lasting thirty minutes: heart rate (HR) target is defined as 1/3x(HR at respiratory compensation point) + 2/3x(HR anaerobic threshold)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • University of Sao Paulo

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Miguel MF Silva, MD · Heart Institute (InCor) HC FMUSP

  • Guilherme V Guimaraes, PhD · Heart Institute (InCor) HC FMUSP

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
30 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-05-31
Primary Completion
2013-04-30
Completion
2013-04-30

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02448147 on ClinicalTrials.gov