MedTrace Logo

A Hemodynamic Comparison of Stationary and Portable Pneumatic Compression Devices

NCT02345642 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2017-10-16

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

We are comparing two pneumatic compression devices, VenaFlow (stationary) and MCS (portable) in both the supine an standing position. We will start supine and will take 3 baseline measurements of venous velocity and then apply a device and take 3 measurements of the increase in peak venous velocity. We will repeat this with the second device. We will then have the subject stand and repeat the above with each device. We will randomize the order of the devices in the supine and standing position. This study will involve 10 healthy subjects of various ages and 10 total hip replacements (THR) patients.

Conditions

  • Total Hip Arthroplasty

Interventions

DEVICE

ActiveCare+SFT Supine

DEVICE

VenaFlow Elite Supine

DEVICE

ActiveCare+SFT Standing

DEVICE

VenaFlow Elite Standing

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • DJO Incorporated

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Lucian Warth, MD · Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-02-28
Primary Completion
2015-06-30
Completion
2016-01-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02345642 on ClinicalTrials.gov