Automated Control of End-tidal Volatile Anesthetic Concentration

NCT02342509 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 63

Last updated 2015-01-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The new MIRUS system as well as the established AnaConDa system uses a reflector to conserve volatile anaesthetics (VA). Both systems act with commercially available ICU ventilators. In contrast to AnaConDa the MIRUS includes an automated control of end-tidal VA concentrations. In this study the investigators compared feasibility, costs and recovery times after anaesthesia with isoflurane (ISO), sevoflurane (SEVO) or desflurane (DES) in ventilated and spontaneously breathing patients.

Conditions

  • Delayed Recovery From Anesthesia

Interventions

DRUG

Desflurane

Group A: Desflurane 5.0-6.0 Vol% (1.0 MAC) in Oxygen (FiO2 0.8-0.95)

DRUG

Sevoflurane

Group B: Sevoflurane 1.4-2.1 Vol% (1.0 MAC) in Oxygen (FiO2 0.8-0.95)

DRUG

Isoflurane

Group C: Isoflurane 0.9-1.2 Vol% (1.0 MAC) in Oxygen (FiO2 0.8-0.95)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ruhr University of Bochum

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Thomas Weber, PhD · Ruhr-Universtiy of Bochum, Germany

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-09-30
Primary Completion
2014-12-31
Completion
2014-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02342509 on ClinicalTrials.gov