A Controlled Comparison of Pulsed Radiofrequency Vs Physical Therapy on Treating Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT02294864 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2015-12-23
Summary
It is estimated that nearly 27 million US adults have osteoarthritis (OA) and suffer from pain . Pulsed Radio Frequency (PRF) is one method that has been successfully used in treatment of various etiologies of pain. However there are limited studies and research that prove its effectiveness in treating articular pain. The proposed study's primary aim is determining if PRF is an effective treatment for chronic osteoarthritic knee pain. This study hypothesizes that PRF has analgesic properties immediately after treatment and at least 3 months afterwards compared to control treatment with physical therapy.
Additionally this research project addresses several other objectives including:
1. Provide a controlled study to determine the effectiveness of PRF for intra-articular pain
2. Determine how effective PRF is 1 month and 3 months after treatment for articular pain.
3. Further scientific evidence on the overall effectiveness of PRF
4. Provide evidence that PRF likely has other mechanism of action besides direct nerve stimulation of inhibitory pain pathways.
5. Compare the effectiveness of PRF vs Physical Therapy in treating chronic knee osteoarthritis.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Percutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency
Pulsed Radiofrequency
- PROCEDURE
-
Physical Therapy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Southern California Institute for Research and Education
collaborator OTHER -
VA Long Beach Healthcare System
lead FED
Principal Investigators
-
Ronald Takemoto, M.D. · Principal Investigator
-
Ravi Mirpuri, D.O. · Long Beach VA resident
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2017-04-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Pulsed Radiofrequency
NCT06894147 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RF TKA Prehabilitation
NCT03758300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does Radiofrequency Ablation of the Articular Nerves of the Knee Prior to Total Knee Replacement Improve Pain Outcomes
NCT02746874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Cooled and Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation of the Geniculate Nerves for the Treatment of Chronic Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
NCT02260869 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Pilot Study of PEMF Therapy in Treatment of Post-operative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02211534 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation and Intra-Articular Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
NCT07098455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency Acupuncture for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06702046 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsed Radiofrequency and Osteoarthritic Chronic Knee Pain
NCT04454710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Standardized Radial Pressure Wave Techniques Versus Pain-Site Guided Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.
NCT06622512 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsed Radiofrequency Therapy vs Canal Adductor Blockade in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05962463 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Does Physical Therapy Prevent Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With End Stage Osteoarthritis
NCT02377102 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Proof of Concept Study of PEMF (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field) Therapy in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT02696083 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Genicular Nerve and Intra-articular Radiofrequency Versus Platelet Rich Plasma Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT03379883 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation on Pain Relief of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05050396 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Multi Radiance Medical® Super Pulsed Laser on Chronic Knee Pain
NCT05830344 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Magnetic Field Therapy Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve-stimulation in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06406231 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Outcome and Analgesia in TKA: Radiofrequency vs Continuous Adductor Canal Block
NCT02680392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinial Application of Park et al.(The Knee 27 (2020) 1577-1584)'s Study
NCT05202847 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness Study of the Ivivi SofPulse for Pain Amelioration in Adults With Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT01457742 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Therapy in Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis in Elderly Patients: An Observational Study
NCT07113028 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
The Effect of PEMF for Patients With Knee OA
NCT05548712 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intra-articular Pulsed Radiofrequency in Chronic Knee Pain
NCT06017674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Using Physical Therapy Resources for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT02636764 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous vs Conventional Radiofrequency Applications for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritic Pain
NCT06520371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Trial in knEe Osteoarthritis Using Low Intensity Ultrasound - Evaluating Feasibility (RELIEF)
NCT01623804 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA