Interval Versus Continuous Training in Healthy Adults

NCT02288403 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 44

Last updated 2016-06-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Aerobic exercise produces increases in cardiorespiratory fitness (CF), which constitute a protective factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Therefore, aerobic exercise is a key strategy to promoting cardiovascular. There is some evidence that aerobic high intensity interval training may lead to greater increases in CF compared with continuous moderate-intensity training.

The main objective of this study is to examine the effects of an aerobic high intensity training program versus a continuous moderate intensity training program on CF in men 18 to 44 years.

Conditions

  • Healthy Volunteers

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Aerobic interval training

BEHAVIORAL

Continuous training

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universidad de Antioquia

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Víctor H Arboleda, MSc · Associate Professor

  • Elkin F Arango, MD. MSc · Associate Professor

  • Rubén D Gómez, PhD. MD · Professor

  • Yuri Feito, PhD · Assistant Professor

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
44 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-04-30
Primary Completion
2016-06-30
Completion
2016-06-30

Countries

  • Colombia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02288403 on ClinicalTrials.gov