Determination of TOF Test Threshold for Obtaining Reliable Pedicle Screw Stimulation Test During Lumbar Spine Surgery

NCT02285829 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 46

Last updated 2018-01-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

During lumbar spine fusion surgery intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is in routine use for prevention of possible nerve injuries during placement of screw into pedicle. Pedicle screw stimulation test is performed to assess if screw placement is encroaching on the nerve roots. Relative distance between the pedicle screw and the neighbouring root can be estimated by the intensity of the current required to activate the root and appropriate muscle. A properly placed screw can be distinguished from those perforating the pedicle wall by its higher minimum level of electrical current needed to elicit a muscle response. The minimum level is deemed as threshold. This test is based on compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) should be avoided because of possible cause of false negative results of screw stimulation test. Neuromuscular blocking agents, which are in routine use during anesthesia, will have effect on muscle action potential. When NMBA are used current stimulus will depolarize the same number of axons and the associated muscle response will be present but of lower amplitude because some percentage of motor fibers will be blocked by activity of NMBA. At this point, stronger stimulus is needed to recruit additional axons/muscle fibers , and hence, the measured threshold is elevated.

Train of four (TOF) test is method used to determine level of neuromuscular blockade, by stimulation of peripheral nerve and following induced muscle contractions. Interpretation of muscle contractions may be by subjective (visual) or objective (quantitative) method. Quantitative TOF test may be used prior screw stimulation test by calculating T4/T1 ratio and obtaining quantitative value which shows level of neuromuscular blockade. Residual neuromuscular blockade may be present before screw stimulation test, and effect on accuracy of this test in this situation was not clearly investigated in recent studies.

The purpose of this study would be to determine changes of screw stimulation thresholds under different range of neuromuscular blockade.Therefore, acceptable neuromuscular blockade threshold (determined by TOF test) acceptable for obtaining reliable screw stimulation test should be determined. Screw stimulation test may be performed when neuromuscular blockade is absent and compared to repeated screw stimulation test when neuromuscular blockade is present. Different levels of neuromuscular blockade may provide different results on screw stimulation test, so if difference is statistically significant, induced neuromuscular blockade level may be set as threshold value, acceptable for obtaining reliable testing results.

Conditions

  • Neuromuscular Blockade

Interventions

DRUG

Rocuronium Bromide, Cisatracurium Besylate

Both Rocuronium Bromide and Cisatracurium Besylate are administered intravenously following induction of anesthesia initially by bolus, and subsequently re-bolused or administered in continuous infusion as clinically indicated to maintain muscle relaxation. Initial doses of Rocuronium range from 0.45 to 1.2 mg/kg IV, and doses for continuous infusion range from 0.01-0.012 mg/kg/min IV. Initial doses of Cisatracurium range from 0.15 to 0.2 mg/kg, and doses for continuous infusion range from 0.5 to 3 µg/kg/min. Following recovery and baseline screw stimulation at TOF \>0.9, the dosing regimen for this study will rely on restarting a continuous infusion, and adjusting the infusion until the desired TOF ratios are reached. Following screw stimulations and data collection, the infusion will be terminated, and neuromuscular blockade allowed to recover.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Aleksandar Beric, MD · Neurologist

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-02-11
Primary Completion
2018-01-08
Completion
2018-01-08

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02285829 on ClinicalTrials.gov