Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment

NCT02126085 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2016-05-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Sedation vs Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment Trial (SIESTA) is a prospective, randomised controlled, monocentric, two-armed, comparative trial. Patients are randomized 1 : 1 to either non-intubated state or to intubated state for endovascular stroke treatment. Otherwise, no principal differences in intensive care treatment are intended, and standard operating procedures are applied to ensure uniform management decisions in fields such as ventilation, sedation, cardio-vascular and cerebral monitoring and management.

Conditions

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Endovascular recanalisation

Endovascular recanalisation by mechanical thrombectomy with e.g. stent retriever device, possibly following intravenous thrombolysis within a "bridging concept"

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital Heidelberg

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Julian Bösel, PD · Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-04-30
Primary Completion
2016-02-29
Completion
2016-05-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02126085 on ClinicalTrials.gov