The Use of Biologic Mesh vs Bioabsorbable Mesh During Ventral Hernia Repair in At-risk Patients
NCT01794338 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2022-08-15
Summary
This study evaluates the outcomes of patients who have been treated with Strattice or Gore Bio-A mesh for the repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias. The purpose of this study is to collect information and evaluate the outcome of your surgery. Synthetic (man made) mesh has been shown to provide durable long-term outcomes; however, this type of mesh should not be used in patients at risk of developing an infection. Therefore, to address the challenge of finding an artificial strengthening material to repair complicated hernias in patients that could potentially develop surgical infection, two types of non-permanent materials have been developed, including biologics and bioabsorbables. Biologic mesh is made of living tissue and bioabsorbable mesh is made of synthetic material that is gradually absorbed by the body over time. The purpose of this study is to allow surgeons to compare the postoperative course of patients associated with these two mesh types to decide which material will improve the outcomes of their patients with complicated abdominal wall defects. To date there is no evidence to suggest that either mesh type is superior or safer than the other.
Conditions
- Ventral Hernia
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Strattice Arm
Biologic mesh to be placed during hernia repair surgery
- DEVICE
-
Bio-A Arm
Bioabsorbable mesh to be placed during hernia repair surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Brant T Heniford, MD · Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2017-07-31
- Completion
- 2017-07-21
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Biologic Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Repair of Ventral Hernias
NCT02451176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Zenapro™ Hybrid Hernia Repair Device for Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01784822 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective Trial of a Bio-absorbable Mesh in Challenging Laparoscopic Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02712398 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width
NCT03429374 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Transfacial Sutures Versus Stapler for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT00773851 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using Biologic Mesh
NCT04780048 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparative Effectiveness Multicenter Trial for Adhesion Characteristics of Ventral Hernia Repair Mesh
NCT01355939 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Observational Biologic or Prosthetic Mesh
NCT03317665 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Multi-Center Study To Examine The Use Of Flex HD® And Strattice In The Repair Of Large Abdominal Wall Hernias
NCT01987700 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Xen Matrix™ AB Surgical Graft in Ventral or Incisional Midline Hernias
NCT02691962 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post Market Study of Parietene™ DS Composite Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03495154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Sample Characteristics Between Subjects Who Received Strattice Mesh for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
NCT04534920 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
RCT Ventralex vs Onlay Mesh in Incisional Hernias
NCT04358159 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Open Complex Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Material for Midline Fascial Closure Reinforcement
NCT01325792 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of Absorbable Biosynthetic Meshes in Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT04132986 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Impact of 3D Patch One-Suture Fixation vs No Fixation on Chronic Pain and Recurrence in Ⅲ Inguinal Hernia
NCT06879860 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility Study of The Use of FLEX HD® Surgical Implant or STRATTICE® Reconstructive Tissue Matrix in The Closure of Abdominal Wall Defects With Component Separation in Clean or Contaminated Cases
NCT01597128 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Clinical Performance of a Biological Matrix Used in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
NCT04580511 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
A Comparison of the Outcomes in Fortiva and Strattice Mesh
NCT05572021 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Fortiva and Strattice Tissue Matrices in Complex, Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT02587403 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Phasix Mesh Use in Complex Open Ventral Hernias Study
NCT04580524 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh for Treatment of Paraesophageal Hernia
NCT02242526 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Type of Material in Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
NCT00257946 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Clinical Trial Using Spy Elite System in Planning Tissue Advancement Flaps After Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01886963 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gentrix™ Versus Biological or Prosthetic Mesh
NCT03034213 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA