Comparison of a Water-soluble Topical Antimicrobial to Silver Sulfadiazine in Partial Thickness Burns
NCT01926392 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 8
Last updated 2013-08-21
Summary
Partial thickness burns are a common, painful injury requiring a great deal of resources in their care. Silver sulfadizine is a commonly-used topical antimicrobial, but is difficult to remove due to its lipid base. We are comparing a water-based topical antimicrobial therapy to silver sulfadiazine and hypothesize that the water-based therapy is superior in terms of pain control and resources required to deliver care.
Conditions
- Burn
Interventions
- DRUG
-
water-soluble therapy
The patient acted as their own control and the experimental and comparison arms (water-soluble therapy and silver sulfadiazine) were alternated on a daily basis
- DRUG
-
silver sulfadiazine
The patient acted as their own control and the experimental and comparison arms (water-soluble therapy and silver sulfadiazine) were alternated on a daily basis
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Virginia
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jonathan Black, MD · University of Virginia
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2011-10-31
- Completion
- 2011-10-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Topical Collagen-Silver Versus Standard Care Following Removal of Ingrown Nails
NCT00641433 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Purified Native Type 1 Collagen Extracellular Matrix With Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Antimicrobial (PCMP) and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT06618612 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PRF With Topical Antibiotics or Antiseptics in Chronical Wounds Version 1.4
NCT02652169 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety Study of DERMAGEN® vs Conventional Treatment to Treat Diabetic Neuropathic Foot Ulcer
NCT00521937 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Study of SANTYL® vs Hydrogel (SoloSite®) for Pressure Ulcers
NCT02718625 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Modified Platform Trial Assessing Multiple CAMPs and SOC vs SOC Alone in the Treatment of Hard-to-Heal DFUs
NCT06449638 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effects of HP828-101 Versus Standard of Care in the Management of Partial or Full Thickness Wounds
NCT00971048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention and Treatment of Frostbite Infection With Antimicrobial Pharmacokinetic Analysis
NCT06266494 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ultrasonic Wound Debridement vs. Standard Sharp Debridement
NCT01237392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Phase 2 Randomized Study to Compare Ultrasonic Drug Delivery to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Infections in Non-Healing Wounds
NCT03732365 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Difference in Wound Size Reduction Comparing Two Frequently Used Wound Dressings in Everyday Care
NCT03596112 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution at 0.125% vs Placebo for the Healing of Grade IIB Ulcers of Diabetic Foot
NCT03209466 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial of STIMULAN VG vs Standard of Care (SoC) for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis Associated With Stage IV Pressure Ulcers.
NCT06283979 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Study of the Efficacy of Sharp Debridement for the Management of Chronic Wounds
NCT00990522 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Human Placental Membrane Products and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT07089602 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Use of Santyl in Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT02581488 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Treatment of Infected Surgical Wounds With Negative Pressure Topical Therapy and Instillation (With or Without Antiseptic) Versus no Instillation
NCT02500875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of ConnettivinaBio Plus Cream Compared to ConnettivinaBio Cream in the Management of Wounds in Patients at High Risk of Infection
NCT04936204 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Open Multi-centre Investigation to Evaluate Signs and Symptoms of Local Inflammation/Infection on Chronic Ulcers and Partial Thickness Burns When Using Mepilex Border Ag as an Anti-microbial Wound Dressing
NCT01214811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Reducing Wound Infections Using Bioelectric Wound Dressings
NCT06312267 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
PRP Versus PRF Versus Conventional Treatment in Chronic Non-healing Skin Ulcers
NCT06281483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Effectiveness of a Collagen-ORC Antimicrobial Matrix in Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT00235209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A RCT to Compare the Effects of Two Wound Products on Biofilm Disruption in DFUs
NCT02181621 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Topical Morphine in the Treatment of Severe Local Pain of Chronic Wounds
NCT02028923 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effectiveness Study of Santyl Ointment to Treat Pressure Ulcers
NCT01208220 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA