Study of SANTYL® vs Hydrogel (SoloSite®) for Pressure Ulcers
NCT02718625 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 3
Last updated 2020-03-10
Summary
This study is designed to compare SANTYL® versus hydrogel (SoloSite®) in the treatment of pressure ulcers for participants in a long-term care facility. After meeting study criteria, participants will be randomly assigned for application of SANTYL® or SoloSite® to their pressure ulcer for up to 6 weeks. A study previously conducted showed that in the long-term care setting, the removal of dead skin (debridement) with SANTYL® resulted in more participants achieving complete debridement, more rapidly than when SoloSite® is used. The goal of the present study is to confirm the results of the earlier study, demonstrating superior debridement outcomes for pressure ulcers of patients in long-term care as compared to ulcers managed with SoloSite®.
Conditions
- Pressure Ulcer
Interventions
- BIOLOGICAL
-
Santyl
Collagenase ointment applied topically
- BIOLOGICAL
-
SoloSite®
SOLOSITE is a hydrogel wound dressing with preservatives. It can donate moisture to rehydrate non-viable tissue. It absorbs exudate while retaining its structure in the wound.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Herbert B Slade, MD · Smith & Nephew, Inc.
-
Jaime E Dickerson, PhD · Smith & Nephew, Inc.
-
Martha Kelso, RN · Wound Care Plus
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-03-09
- Completion
- 2017-03-09
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Wound Edge Changes Following Treatment With Santyl
NCT01197898 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Enzymatic Versus (vs) Autolytic Debridement of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01143727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Multi Center Site , Controlled Trial Comparing a Bioengineered Skin Substitute to a Human Skin Allograft
NCT01676272 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Santyl vs. Sharp Debridement of Diabetic Foot Wounds
NCT01056198 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Trial on the Efficacy of Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution and Prontosan Wound Gel
NCT01153633 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluating Several Cellular, Acellular, and Matrix-like Products (CAMPs) and Standard of Care Versus Matched Standard of Care Controls in the Management of Nonhealing Pressure Ulcers
NCT06999590 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prontosan Versus Saline in the Cleansing of Chronic Leg Ulcers in Diabetic Patients
NCT01554644 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restore Calcium Alginate Dressing, Silver vs Aquacel Ag in the Treatment of Critically Colonized Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT01396304 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Porcine Xenograft Versus Second Intention Healing
NCT03931746 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Look at the Effects of Four Weeks of Treatment on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01143714 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Multicenter, Prospective, Clinical Trial Evaluating a Single Layer Amniotic Membrane and Standard of Care Versus Matched Controls in the Management of Nonhealing Pressure Ulcers
NCT07126886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Transforming Powder Dressing to NPIAP Recommended Standard of Care Therapies in Stage 2, 3 and 4 Pressure Injuries
NCT05496296 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Concomitant Use of ACell MicroMatrix® and ACell Cytal™ to Standard of Care in Stage 3 or 4 Pressure Injuries
NCT03283787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RESTART the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers: Comparing the Effectiveness and Cost of a Reactive Static Air Mattress and Alternating Air Pressure Mattress
NCT06294327 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Comparing Cytal Wound Matrix 1-Layer to Standard of Care
NCT03626623 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing SOC +Skin IQ MCM vs SOC for Pressure Ulcer (PU)
NCT02363842 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Aquacel® Ag Versus Mepilex® Border Ag to Manage Bioburden in Leg Ulcers
NCT01427491 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution on Venous Ulcers
NCT01048307 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Study With PriMatrix and PriMatrix Ag for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT01612806 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Confirm Safety and Performance of Avance Solo and Avance Solo Adapt NPWT Systems
NCT04753294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Purified Native Type 1 Collagen Extracellular Matrix With Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Antimicrobial (PCMP) and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT06618612 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Using Prontosan to Treat Bacterial Biofilm
NCT06185465 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Cutaneous Ulcers With a Novel Biological Dressing
NCT00207818 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Real-World Effectiveness of Amniotic Membrane Allografts Versus Standard Wound Care in DFU, VLU, and PU
NCT07223281 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
A RCT Evaluating the Clinical Benefit of a Silver Dressing in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT05923749 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA