A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Open Dressing With Petrolatum Jelly vs. Standard Gauze Dressing With Silver Sulfadiazine
NCT02109718 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2014-04-10
Summary
The Effectiveness of open dressing with petrolatum jelly in minor burns has not been clearly established. This study determined if the use of open dressings with petrolatum jelly as effective as standard gauze dressing with silver sulfadiazine in treating minor burns in terms of time-to-re-epithelialization, incidence of wound infection,incidence of adverse reactions, and patient acceptance.
Non-extensive superficial partial thickness burns constitute a major proportion of burn injuries. Conventional treatment involves regular changing of absorptive dressings including the application of a topical antimicrobial, commonly silver sulfadiazine. A systematic review has found insufficient evidence to support or refute such antimicrobial prophylaxis. Another review compared silver sulfadiazine dressings with other occlusive and non-antimicrobial dressings and found insufficient evidence to guide practice. Other research has suggested that dressings with petrolatum gel are as effective as silver sulfadiazine. This trial sought to compare the effectiveness of conventional silver sulfadiazine dressings with treatment with petrolatum gel alone.
Conditions
- Superficial Partial Thickness Burns
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Open Dressings with Petrolatum Jelly
participants randomized to this arm had their wounds dressed with a thin layer (1mm) of petrolatum gel applied over the burn wound and instructed to reapply the gel as needed in the event of gel coming off.
- DRUG
-
Silver Sulfadiazine Gauze Dressing Group
Participants randomized to this arm had their wounds dressed using the standard methods at the Burn Center. An initial layer of fine mesh gauze is applied that is laden with a 2mm layer of silver sulfadiazine cream. This is covered with layers of moist gauze and an outer layer of dry gauze, secured by wrapping with rolled gauze. The dressing extends at least 1 inch beyond the wound edge.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Committee on Research Implementation and Development
collaborator UNKNOWN -
University of the Philippines
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-07-31
- Completion
- 2010-07-31
Countries
- Philippines
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Trial of Topical Aloe Vera Gel in Emergency Department Patients Presenting With Simple Traumatic Wounds
NCT02819817 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Olivamine-containing Products in the Management of Patients With Nonhealing Lower Extremity Ulcers
NCT01657318 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Topical Agents Containing Magnesium Sulfate & Wound Healing in the Rat Model
NCT04886882 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Treatment of Infected Surgical Wounds With Negative Pressure Topical Therapy and Instillation (With or Without Antiseptic) Versus no Instillation
NCT02500875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution at 0.125% vs Placebo for the Healing of Grade IIB Ulcers of Diabetic Foot
NCT03209466 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
PRF With Topical Antibiotics or Antiseptics in Chronical Wounds Version 1.4
NCT02652169 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Observational Study of Clinical Performance of a Sterile, Bacteria-binding, Super-absorbent Wound Dressing
NCT02662218 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Wound Dressings for Pemphigus and Pemphigoid
NCT02365675 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Plasma Rich Growth Factors in Venous Ulcers
NCT01491438 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of a Novel Wound Gel to Improve Wound Healing in Chronic Wounds
NCT03686904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Next Science Wound Gel Efficacy in Chronic Wound Versus Standard of Care
NCT02138994 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Negative Wound Pressure on P.S
NCT06243328 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Next Science Wound Gels in Healing Below the Knee Amputation Surgical Wound Compared to SOC
NCT04053946 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Painless Sharp Wound Debridement With Lidocaine-23%-Tetra-caine-7% Gel Versus EMLA 5% Cream
NCT05890703 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Use of Morphine Gel Topically in Patients With Stage 2-3 Wounds
NCT00755989 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Case Series Evaluating a Collagen Wound Dressing to Treat Wounds
NCT03909503 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Care Dressing
NCT03566641 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open, Non-comparative, Multi-centre Post Marketing Clinical Follow-up Investigation to Evaluate Performance and Safety on Diabetic Foot Ulcer, DFU When Using Fast Gelling Dressing as Intended.
NCT02091778 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Efficacy of ADM Hydrogel vs. Alginate Dressings in Chronic Trauma Wounds
NCT06978569 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PMS Study to Confirm the Ongoing Safety and Performance of Silver II Non-woven Dressing in Chronic and Acute Wounds
NCT05045430 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of rhGM-CSF on the Healing of Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT04823962 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Efficacy of Hydrocolloid Dressing vs. Topical Antibiotic on Wound Healing of Post-Punch Biopsy Wounds
NCT07064161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety Study of DERMAGEN® vs Conventional Treatment to Treat Diabetic Neuropathic Foot Ulcer
NCT00521937 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Low-level Laser Therapy Versus High Frequency on Pressure Ulcers Treatment
NCT02296697 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Evaluate ENERGI-F703 GEL in Diabetic Foot Ulcer
NCT05930210 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3