Impact of Gastric Tube Reconstruction Widths on Quality of Life for Esophagogastric Cancers
NCT01911832 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2016-09-13
Summary
The incidence of cancer of the esophagogastric junction has rapidly risen in recent three decades, and surgery still remains the optimum therapy. For Siewert's type II and III cancer, esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after subtotal gastrectomy are regarded as the two main surgical approaches. Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy brings high survival rate and low local recurrence rate which may also induces pulmonary infection or regurgitation. Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after subtotal gastrectomy needs reconstruction of the gastric tube and the width of reconstruction tube was a key factor to predicate prognosis. However, no evidence supplies a comprehensive standard on the width of reconstruction tube which often ranges from 3 cm to 6 cm. Both narrow and wide reconstruction tubes have their own advantages and disadvantages. So the prospective trail recruits patients into three groups: total gastrostomy group (TG group), wide gastric tube group (WG group) and narrow gastric tube group (NG group). And the investigators compare the quality of life using integrated questionnaire of QLQ-STO22 and QLQ-C30 and related symptom relief as main endpoints.
Conditions
- Stomach Neoplasms
- Esophageal Neoplasms
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy
- PROCEDURE
-
Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after subtotal gastrectomy
- PROCEDURE
-
wide tube reconstruction after subtotal gastrectomy
- PROCEDURE
-
narrow tube reconstruction after subtotal gastrectomy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
West China Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-02-28
- Completion
- 2017-02-28
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Esophagogastrectomy Versus Extended Gastrectomy in AEG II
NCT02302118 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Preliminary Efficacy Analysis of Cheng's Giraffe Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT04657848 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Assisted Radical Gastrectomy for Advanced Siewert II/III AEG
NCT04153058 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Clinical Study of Transthoracic Single-hole Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Siewert Ⅱ AEG
NCT04423354 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety of Totally Laparoscopic Versus Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy.
NCT04351321 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Linear Stapler Versus Circular Stapler in Esophagojejunostomy
NCT05360069 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Neck Flexion on Esophagogastric Anastomotic Leakage After MIE
NCT02418052 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of the Techniques for Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis on Outcome in Ivor-Lewis Oesophagectomy
NCT01242124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Robotic vs Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for cT4a Gastric Cancer
NCT07331454 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT05541783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-gastric Conduit Reconstruction After Esophagectomy
NCT07064655 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Outcomes After Esophagectomy With a Focus on Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Quality of Life
NCT00260559 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Transhiatal Tunnel Valvuloplasty for Reconstruction Following the Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06354036 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonic Scalpel vs. Monopolar Electrocautery for D2 Distal Gastric Carcinoma Surgery
NCT02130752 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Traditional Three-incision Esophagectomy Versus Minimally Invasive Thorascopic and Laparoscopic Esophagectomy
NCT02448966 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Ivor Lewis and Tri-incision Approaches for Patients With Esophageal Cancer
NCT02017002 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Supercharged TRAM Evaluation in Cervical Esophagogastroplasty After Esophagectomy
NCT05954702 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Deeper Intubation Make Effects on Cervical Esophageal ESD
NCT06420258 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Using the Subglottic Pressure to Predict the Dysphagia After Partial Laryngectomy
NCT06024980 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single-center Study on Laparoscopic Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT02219854 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety Comparison of Total Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With or Without Preservation of the Celiac Branch of the Vagus Nerve for Early Upper Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT07142122 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Thoracoscopic and Laparoscopic Esophagectomy vs. Hand-assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy: A Prospective Trial.
NCT00247936 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Technique for Endoscopic Transaxillary Thyroidectomy Comparison
NCT05735054 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Perioperative Management and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
NCT03378869 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Assessment of Different Modified POEM for Achalasia
NCT04578769 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA