Induction With Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study
NCT01801410 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 602
Last updated 2015-12-14
Summary
Between 40,000 and 80,000 pregnant women die annually from pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Magnesium sulphate and anti-hypertensive therapies can reduce the morbidity associated with pre-eclampsia. The only cure, however, comes with delivery. Prompt delivery of the baby, preferably by vaginal route, is vital in order to achieve good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Induction of labour is therefore a critical intervention in order to prevent morbidity to both mother and baby. Two low cost interventions - oral misoprostol tablets and transcervical Foley catheterization - are already used by some in low resource settings, but their relative risks and benefits are not known. These interventions could optimize the care pathway for women needing induction of labour. This is especially important in low resource settings where improvement is most needed and the potential to reduce the maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity is the greatest. The ideal induction agent would result in a relatively short induction to delivery interval without risk to fetus and with low rates of emergency caesarean section. The induction to delivery interval is especially important in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia where the condition may deteriorate rapidly until delivery. Inductions with prostaglandins, including misoprostol, are sometimes associated with uterine hyperstimulation and consequent fetal hypoxia, whilst the effectiveness and safety of Foley catheter as an induction agent has been persistently questioned. This study will identify the risk, benefits and trade-offs in efficacy, safety, acceptability and cost of these two low cost induction methods.
Conditions
- Pre-eclampsia
- Fetus or Newborn; Effects of Induction of Labor
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Foley Catheter
Transcervical Foley catheter (silicone, size 18F with 30ml balloon)
- DRUG
-
25mcg every 2 hours for maximum of 12 doses
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Gynuity Health Projects
collaborator OTHER -
Government Dental College and Hospital, India
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Daga Memorial Women's Hospital, Nagpur, India
collaborator OTHER -
University of Liverpool
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Andrew D Weeks, MD FRCOG · University of Liverpool
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-06-30
- Completion
- 2015-06-30
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
NCT03407625 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lignocaine Nebulization for Attenuation of Intubation Stress Response
NCT04441073 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Randomized Trial Comparing Misoprostol and Foley Bulb for Labor Induction in the Preterm Gestation
NCT00325026 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Randomized Comparison of Transcervical Foley Bulb With Vaginal Misoprostol to Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
NCT02566005 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Foley vs Propess for Induction of Labor in Women With Term PROM : Mode of Delivery, Maternal and Fetal Outcomes
NCT04565340 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Combined Method for Induction of Labor
NCT02685085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Tocolysis for Preterm Labor
NCT00811057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PROMMO Trial: Oral Misoprostol vs IV Oxytocin
NCT04478942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
NCT02477085 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
NCT01139801 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outpatient Foley Catheter Compared to Usual Inpatient Care for Labor Induction
NCT02546193 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Open, Randomized Feasibility Trial on the Safety and Performance of the INGA Catheter for Labor Induction
NCT07214948 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility Clinical Investigation Using the InPress Device for the Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage
NCT04364386 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Versus Inpatient Foley Catheter Induction of Labor
NCT02975167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Amniotomy Versus Delayed Amniotomy Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Nulliparous Labor Induction
NCT03039036 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Labor Induction in Preeclampsia High-risk Women
NCT05056467 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Nitrous Oxide Donor for Labor Induction in Women With PreEclampsia
NCT03171480 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Foley Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Parous Women at Term: A Randomized Trial
NCT01596296 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Ripening for Obese Women: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial
NCT02639429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor
NCT02044458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Induction of Labor
NCT01634854 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Labor Induction With a Combined Method (Pharmacologic and Mechanical): Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03928600 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nifedipine Plus Magnesium Sulfate Versus Magnesium Sulfate for Very Early Preterm Tocolysifs
NCT05345132 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction With Home Induction and In-patient Induction.
NCT06272591 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Satisfaction of Different Methods for Labor Induction
NCT06794385 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4