Preexpanded Perforator Flaps in Children
NCT01700595 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 7
Last updated 2012-10-04
Summary
Contractures and broad scars of the axilla, anterior chest wall and neck have detrimental effects on functional, physical and psychological development of children. Perforator flaps have already been shown to be reliable options for the reconstruction of contractures but there have been no reports demonstrating the value of preexpanded perforator flaps of dorsolateral trunk region in treatment of extensive contractures and scars of pediatric patients. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate these techniques by a case series formed of pediatric patients with broad scars and contractures of anterior chest wall, axilla, neck and breasts. Seven pediatric patients (mean age, 11,6 years) who were treated by preexpanded perforator flaps are presented. By this means, clinical experience on intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) flap, thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap, circumflex scapular artery perforator (CSAP) flap and lumbar artery perforator flap was shared. Flaps as large as 20,5x10,5 cm in size could be successfully transferred in pediatric patients. Broad scar tissues were resurfaced with broad flaps carrying similar characteristics with the uninjured anterior chest wall and neck skin in six of our patients. In one patient with partial necrosis, full thickness skin graft was used for the residual defect. The mean duration of postoperative (after flap transfer) follow-ups was 17,2 months. The preexpanded TDAP, ICAP and CSAP flaps are revealed to be useful reconstructive options for the treatment of scars and contractures of anterior chest wall, axilla, neck and breast in pediatric patients.
Conditions
- Contractures
- Scars
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
new technical intervention
Contractures and broad scars of the subjects are treated by this surgical intervention which is a reconstructive surgery that is performed by the transfer of preexpanded perforator flaps to the recipient sites of skin deficiency.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Istanbul University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Max Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2012-09-30
- Completion
- 2012-09-30
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Purse String Versus Conventional Wound Closure Techniques in Children Undergoing Stoma Reversal
NCT07335835 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Karydakis Flap Versus Burow's Triangle Advancement Flap in the Surgery of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT05289297 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sternal Closure in Children After Cardiac Surgery
NCT05715060 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Rhomboid Flap Versus Primary Closure After Excision of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus. (A Prospective Randomized Study)
NCT01223599 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Limberg and Karydakis Flap in Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT02287935 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Outcomes of Keystone Perforator Island Flap Versus Lay Open in Re-recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT06741449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Excision and Reconstruction of the Natal Cleft With a Parasacral Perforator Flap Versus Open Excision With Secondary Healing, in the Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease.
NCT03534700 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Different Flap Methods in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT05851690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bascom Cleft Lift Versus Limberg Flap for Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
NCT01337869 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Different Technique in Treatment of Chronic Pilonidal Disease
NCT01268969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
NCT06448481 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Limberg Procedure Versus Lateral Advancement Flap With Burrow's Triangle Procedure in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus
NCT02116738 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Care Bundle in Preventing Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury Due to Central Venous Catheter Fixation in Children
NCT06122402 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mass Closure vs Layer by Layer Closure
NCT06016426 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fascial Closure Techniques Post-Operative Pain Laparoscopy
NCT03254056 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of a Novel Technique for Pilonidal Wound Healing
NCT02330159 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison Of Outcome Of Wound Closure After Thyroid Surgery With And Without Platysma Suturing
NCT06485011 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single- vs Double-Layer Cesarean Scar Repair and Myometrial Thickness
NCT07323355 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Open Wide Excision Versus Minimal Surgery for Pilonidal Disease
NCT01241136 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mid-line Excision Versus Karydakis Operation for Pilonidal Sinus
NCT00412659 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
NCT01759381 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Set-back Suture Versus Traditional Vertical Mattress Suture
NCT01773447 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Closure vs Open Technique for Pilonidal Sinus
NCT07311707 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Wound Closure Using a Limberg Flap Versus Secondary Wound Healing Following Pilonidal Sinus Excision
NCT01889394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing Post-operative Outcomes After Children's Sistrunk Procedure With or Without a Drain
NCT07148895 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA