Does Ultrasound Guidance Improve Time to Perform a Spinal or Number of Attempts in Obese Patients?
NCT01680913 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 67
Last updated 2016-11-15
Summary
Spinal anesthesia depends on being able to locate physical landmarks on a patient's body. In obese patients, the commonly used landmarks may be difficult or even impossible to feel. In addition, the spine can be hidden beneath a layer of fatty tissue.
Ultrasound is useful for finding the correct injection site in pregnant patients, but the usefulness of ultrasound has not been adequately evaluated in non-pregnant patients. The potential benefits for obese patients from the use of ultrasound include shortening the duration of the procedure, increasing patient comfort, decreasing the total number of attempts, and aiding in the choice of appropriate needle length for the patient.
The investigators hypothesize that there is no difference in time to perform a spinal anesthetic when landmarking with ultrasound as compared to tactile landmarking in patients with BMI \> 35.
Conditions
- Spinal Anesthesia Administration
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ultrasound guidance
The intervention group's interspaces will be determined using the curved linear probe on a Zonare ultrasound using two views.
- PROCEDURE
-
Palpation of Tuffier's line
Current clinical practice. Standard of care would have the attending anesthetist palpate the Tuffier's line to pinpoint the appropriate location for the spinal.
- PROCEDURE
-
Spinal anesthetic
Subcutaneous local infiltration with a 25g needle we be performed prior to the spinal. Neuraxial technique will be attempted midline with a 25 gauge whitacre needle in the sitting position. Spinals will be attempted on either L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5 interspaces. The amount and type of local anesthetic/intrathecal narcotic will be left to the discretion of the Anesthetist.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Saskatchewan
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jacelyn Larson, MD FRCP · University of Saskatchewan
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2013-12-31
- Completion
- 2013-12-31
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultrasound Prescan vs Conventional Landmark-guided Technique in Spinal Anesthesia in Orthopedic Obese Patients
NCT03075488 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Landmark Guided Midline Versus Pre-procedural Ultrasound Guided Paramedian at L5S1 for Spinal Anaesthesia
NCT02189681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Ultrasound Scanning of the Lumbar Spine Improve Patient Satisfaction and the Ease of Insertion Epidurals?
NCT00996905 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
NCT06241716 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Abnormal Spinal Anatomy
NCT03459105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound High BMI Study
NCT05052658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound for Neuraxial Anesthesia
NCT02553746 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonography for Confirmation of Caudal Injection
NCT02321787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound - Guided Paramedian Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia
NCT02171975 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial on the Effects of Ultrasound Probe Position on Ultrasound-guided Nerve Blocks
NCT01690156 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Comparison of Safety And Efficacy of Neuraxial Anesthesia, Palpation Versus Ultrasound
NCT01322126 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-procedural Ultrasound Techniques Versus Conventional Landmark Technique of Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
NCT02658058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Real-Time Ultrasound Guided Approach For Spinal Anesthesia
NCT01570491 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia
NCT01122693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Landmark vs Ultrasound For Combined Spinal Epidural
NCT06987240 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Midline vs. Paramedian Approaches for US-assisted Spinal Anesthesia
NCT03491943 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
NCT03316352 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Paramedian Spinal Anaesthesia : Comparison Between Land-mark Guided Technique and Real-time Ultrasound Guided Technique.
NCT02767076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Real-time Ultrasound Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks
NCT05165498 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Comparison of Two Anatomic Landmarks With Ultrasonography in Spinal Anesthesia
NCT02330185 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Impact of Ultrasound Guidance on Central Neuraxial Block Success in Patients With Non-Palpable Vertebral Anatomy
NCT07269184 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Does Ultrasound Improve Procedural Time in the Lateral Popliteal Approach to the Sciatic Nerve in Obese Patients
NCT01579747 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Real-time Ultrasound-guided Paramedian Epidural Access: Evaluation of a Novel In-plane Transverse View Technique
NCT01686243 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Image Study for Ultrasound-assisted Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia
NCT03929874 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Peripheral Blocks Under Ultrasound Control With and Without Electrical Nerve Stimulation
NCT05054881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA