MedTrace Logo

Midline vs. Paramedian Approaches for US-assisted Spinal Anesthesia

NCT03491943 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 112

Last updated 2019-12-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Ultrasound has emerged as an useful tool for neuraxial blockade. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety between the midline approach and paramedian approach for ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia in adult patients.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia, Spinal
  • Ultrasonography

Interventions

PROCEDURE

ultrasound-assisted midline approach

A preprocedural ultrasound scanning will be done, and skin marking will be made. The needle entry point and insertion angle will be determined based on ultrasound scanning. Spinal anesthesia will be performed via midline approach.

PROCEDURE

ultrasound-assisted paramedian approach

A preprocedural ultrasound scanning will be done, and skin marking will be made. The needle entry point and insertion angle will be determined based on ultrasound scanning. Spinal anesthesia will be performed via paramedian approach.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jin-Tae Kim, MD, PhD · Seoul National University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-04-27
Primary Completion
2018-10-08
Completion
2018-10-09

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03491943 on ClinicalTrials.gov