Landmark vs Ultrasound For Combined Spinal Epidural
NCT06987240 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 68
Last updated 2025-11-28
Summary
A comparison of two different methods used in routine anesthesia practices will be made for the insertion of a catheter that will be placed at the waist for anesthesia in obese patients who will undergo orthopedic surgery.
60 obese patients aged 40-80, ASA II-III, BMI\>30, who are planned to undergo elective orthopedic lower extremity surgery by placing a combined spinal epidural catheter at Sakarya University Medical Faculty Education and Research Hospital will be included in the study.
General anesthesia or regional anesthesia techniques are routinely used in lower extremity surgery in our clinic. When placing a combined spinal epidural catheter, the entry site is determined by looking at anatomical landmarks or using ultrasound.
Patients will be divided into two different groups as Anatomical Marking or Ultrasound.
Patients in the Ultrasound group will be taken to the block room in our operating room before the operation and a location marking will be performed with Ultrasound in the block room.
Patients in the Anatomical Marking group will be brought to a sitting position in the operating room in the operating room and a location marking will be performed by hand examination.
After determining the needle entry site, patients in both groups will undergo the Combined spinal epidural catheter placement procedure, which is performed routinely under sterile conditions, and the success rate at the first attempt, total success rates, number of needle redirections, and complications during the procedure will be compared.
Conditions
- Obesity (Body Mass Index >30 kg/m2)
- Ultrasonography
- Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ultrasonography-guided combined spinal epidural anesthesia application
patients with BMI\>30
- PROCEDURE
-
Combined spinal epidural anesthesia with Landmark
Patients with BMI\>30
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sakarya University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-08-01
- Completion
- 2025-11-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
NCT06241716 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Analgesia and Local Infiltrative Analgesia Methods on Pain Control
NCT05344079 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound High BMI Study
NCT05052658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Retroclavicular Infraclavicular Versus Axillary Block as Regional Anesthesia in Obese Patients
NCT07209995 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-procedural Ultrasound Techniques Versus Conventional Landmark Technique of Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
NCT02658058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Central Versus Peripheral Placement of Local Anesthetic
NCT00699244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Poorly-palpable Surface Landmarks
NCT03377764 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Does Ultrasound Guidance Improve Time to Perform a Spinal or Number of Attempts in Obese Patients?
NCT01680913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combination of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasonography Guidance in Sacroiliac Joint Injections. A Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT05944861 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Abnormal Spinal Anatomy
NCT03459105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics of Regional Anasthesia and General Anesthesia
NCT06674954 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Real-time Ultrasound Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks
NCT05165498 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Effectiveness of Peripheral Blocks Under Ultrasound Control With and Without Electrical Nerve Stimulation
NCT05054881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Subcoracoid Tunnel Block Versus Costoclavicular Block
NCT07305584 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
NOL-Guided vs Conventional Intraoperative Opioid Infusion on Outcomes in Geriatric Patients
NCT07075003 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Impact of Interscalene Block Combined With General Anesthesia on Burst Suppression in Shoulder Surgery Patients
NCT07081672 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lateral Sagittal vs Costoclavicular Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block
NCT04356521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Landmark Guided Midline Versus Pre-procedural Ultrasound Guided Paramedian at L5S1 for Spinal Anaesthesia
NCT02189681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Anatomic Landmarks With Ultrasonography in Spinal Anesthesia
NCT02330185 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Three Different Sitting Positions for Performing Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia
NCT03541798 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound for Neuraxial Anesthesia
NCT02553746 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Neuraxial Anaesthesia: Does BMI Relate to Ease of Neuraxial Anaesthesia?
NCT03315845 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Two Different Regional Anesthetic Methods in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients
NCT07092982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Real-Time Ultrasound Guided Approach For Spinal Anesthesia
NCT01570491 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Safety And Efficacy of Neuraxial Anesthesia, Palpation Versus Ultrasound
NCT01322126 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA