Clinician JUdgment Versus Risk Score to Predict Stroke outComes: The JURASSIC Clinical Trial

NCT01657279 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 111

Last updated 2012-10-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Background: Several risk score models are now available to assist clinicians estimate outcomes after an acute ischemic stroke. Limited information is available on the predictive value of these scores compared to real outcomes and clinical judgment.

Objectives: To compare clinician judgment with the use of a validated stroke risk score (iScore) and patients' outcomes.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Clinical scenarios

Clinicians will be randomized to a sequence of 5 clinical scenarios with a variable range of expected outcome \[i.e. from low (\<10%) to high (\>50%) expected risk death at 30 days\].

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario

    collaborator OTHER
  • Unity Health Toronto

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Gustavo Saposnik, MD MSc FRCPC · Unity Health Toronto

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-07-31
Primary Completion
2012-08-31
Completion
2012-08-31

Countries

  • United States
  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01657279 on ClinicalTrials.gov