MedTrace Logo

Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial - 10 Year Follow-up

NCT01622387 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2019-03-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

During coronary bypass surgery, veins are taken from the leg and applied to the heart and aorta to 'bypass' narrowings in the coronary arteries. However using an artery in the chest, the internal mammary artery, means that the bypass lasts longer than using veins. The investigators recently showed that using an artery from the arm as a bypass vessel, the radial artery, also had less furring up than veins 5 years after surgery. Now the investigators would like to ask patients to come back for an angiogram 10 years following surgery.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery using a radial arterial conduit

Use of radial artery as a bypass conduit/graft to the left circumflex coronary artery region of the heart in CABG surgery

PROCEDURE

Coronary artery bypass surgery using a long saphenous vein conduit

Use of long saphenous vein as a graft/conduit vessel to the left circumflex coronary artery region of the heart in CABG surgery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Imperial College London

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Peter Collins, MA, MD, FRCP · Imperial College London, and RBHFT

  • Neil Moat, MD, FRCS · Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-10-13
Primary Completion
2014-07-03
Completion
2014-07-03

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01622387 on ClinicalTrials.gov