MedTrace Logo

Long Term Follow-up of Open Versus Endoscopic Radial Artery Harvest With CT Angiography

NCT01559376 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 118

Last updated 2017-08-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objectives of the study are two-fold:

1. To determine the mean 5 year patency rate of the radial artery graft (Open vs. Endoscopic) of patients who have already had CABG surgery and who previously participated in the centre's RCT back in 2005-2007 using CTA and MPS-MIBI
2. To determine patient quality of life at 5 years post CABG surgery

It is hypothesized that the mean 5 year patency rate of the radial artery graft harvested endoscopically will be equal to or have greater patency than the radial artery graft harvested via the conventional/open technique. It is further hypothesized that patient quality of life will be similar amongst patients having had the open vs. endoscopic radial artery graft during CABG surgery.

Conditions

  • Arteriosclerosis of Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bob Kiaii, BSc, MD · University of Western Ontario, Lawson Research Institute, University of Western Ontario

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-02-29
Primary Completion
2014-02-28
Completion
2015-02-28

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01559376 on ClinicalTrials.gov