MedTrace Logo

Performance Evaluation of AirWay Medix Closed Suction System Compared With a Standard Closed Suction System

NCT01547507 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26

Last updated 2012-05-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the performance, safety, and ease of use (usability) between two closed suction systems, the AirWay Medix Closed Suction System and Kimberly KimVent while intubated with an endotracheal in hospitals and ICU. 26 adults with an endotracheal tube and mechanical ventilation will be randomized into 2 groups to receive one of the following closed suction systems endotracheal tubes:

1. AirWay Medix Closed Suction System
2. KimVent Turbo-Cleaning Closed Suction System Kimberly clarK The groups will be compared regarding the safety, performance and ease of use (usability).

Conditions

  • Endotracheal Tube
  • Mechanical Ventilation

Interventions

DEVICE

AirWay Medix Closed Suction System

AirWay Medix Closed Suction System

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Biovo Technologies Ltd

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Nimrod Adi, MD · Kaplan Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-03-31
Primary Completion
2012-12-31

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01547507 on ClinicalTrials.gov