Randomized Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Comparison in Cardiac Surgery

NCT01477151 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 464

Last updated 2015-06-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Anesthesia practice in the 21st century is increasingly outcomes-oriented and evidence-based, but there remain significant gaps in our knowledge, even for commonly-encountered clinical situations. Currently, the two most commonly used drugs used for maintenance of anesthesia in cardiac surgical patients are isoflurane and sevoflurane. There is a belief among many cardiac anesthesiologists that sevoflurane is a better cardiac anesthetic than isoflurane, but there is very little data to support this notion. In fact, very little is known about their comparative effects on important patient outcomes because there has not been a large head-to-head prospective randomized clinical trial. This project will supply the data necessary to critically compare the two anesthetics.

Conditions

Interventions

DRUG

Volatile anesthetic

The intervention in this trial is randomization to either maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane or maintenance of anesthesia with isoflurane. The designated volatile anesthetic will be given at a strict minimal amount throughout the entire cardiac surgery (including cardiopulmonary bypass). This regimen (administration throughout the entire operation) has proved to have the greatest efficacy. Apart from this intervention, the anesthetic for patients participating in this trial will not be substantially different from normal practice, as the intention is to allow normal practice (with the exception of the choice of volatile anesthetic agent) to maximize the applicability and external validity of the trial. The management of anticoagulation, cardiac surgical techniques, and other aspects of the procedure will be managed in an unaltered fashion. No IV drug infusions will be permitted until after protamine administration.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Philip M Jones, MD MSc · London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-11-30
Primary Completion
2015-03-31
Completion
2015-03-31

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01477151 on ClinicalTrials.gov