MedTrace Logo

Laparoscopy-assisted Proximal Gastrectomy Versus and Laparoscopy-assisted Total Gastrectomy

NCT01433861 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 7

Last updated 2017-01-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The choice of surgical strategy for patients with proximal gastric cancer is controversial mainly because proximal gastrectomy is infamous for high rates of reflux symptoms and anastomotic stricture. but there are no prospective randomized trials until now.

The primary end point of this study is whether the rate of reflux esophagitis is different or not between LAPG and LATG. Through this study, we

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy

Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy versus Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hyung-Ho Kim, M.D., Ph.D. · Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-07-31
Primary Completion
2012-11-30
Completion
2012-11-30

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01433861 on ClinicalTrials.gov