Sigma CR150 Versus Sigma CR Knee RCT
NCT01418378 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 191
Last updated 2019-08-28
Summary
This study will compare two very similar designs of knee replacement device. One device (Sigma CR150) is a slightly modified version of the original (Sigma CR) and has been modified to enhance/accommodate higher flexion. The original device has been in widespread clinical use with excellent results since 1996 and this study will determine whether the design modifications of the newer device add further value. The newer device has been in clinical use with good short-term(unpublished) outcomes since becoming commercially available in January 2009.
Achieving higher knee flexion may be required for cultural reasons or by the increasingly younger, more active patient population undergoing knee replacement today. In addition to promoting flexion, it is also possible that this design change may help the knee replacement to last longer than traditional implants in patients who achieve higher flexion. Therefore, the study will compare the two devices in terms of survivorship, flexion and other measures of the success of a total knee replacement (range of motion, knee-related quality of life, activity and generic quality of life) over the short-term.
A minimum of one hundred and forty subjects (minimum 70 per group) with osteoarthritis and aged 50-75 years will be included at UK/international hospitals.
Study duration is 2 years and patients will complete standard knee outcome scores plus radiological evaluation.
Subjects would receive one of the study devices regardless of their involvement in the study, and apart from (possible)additional visits, x-rays and/or questionnaires, treatment and follow-up care will be as per the care they would receive outside of the study.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Sigma CR150
Sigma CR150 femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
- DEVICE
-
Sigma CR
Sigma CR femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
DePuy International
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Gautam Chakrabarty, FRCS Orth. · Calderdale and Huddersfield Foundation NHS Trust
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-08-03
- Primary Completion
- 2016-02-17
- Completion
- 2016-02-17
Countries
- India
- Singapore
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Long-term Study of The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Total Knee Replacement System
NCT00734110 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
P.F.C. Sigma Fixed Versus P.F.C. RP Mobile Bearing Total Knee Systems
NCT00208286 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Randomized Fixed Bearing vs Mobile Bearing Cruciate Retaining TKA
NCT00289094 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PFC Sigma Fixed and Mobile Knee Study
NCT00208325 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Survivorship of the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Fixed Bearing Knee With a Cobalt Chrome Tibial Tray
NCT00734019 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does Implant Design Improve Postoperative Flexion?
NCT00380861 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Randomized Trial Using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis of the Advance Medial Pivot Knee
NCT00405470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Using CR and PS Prosthesis in Total Knee Replacement
NCT03877042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating Platform (RP) TC3 Revision Knee in Revision Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00733681 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Single-Center, Epidemiological Study of the Survivorship of the DePuy Sigma HP Unicompartmental Knee Prosthesis
NCT01656694 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Radiographic Migration Analysis of the ATTUNE Cementless CR Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Replacement
NCT06189872 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Signature Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to Conventional TKA and Computer Assisted TKA
NCT01145157 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Cemented Versus Cementless Tibial Prosthesis Study
NCT01041937 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Clinical Outcomes of the Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System
NCT02175576 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Mechanics Analysis of Patients Having a Sigma Mobile Bearing TKA
NCT01714492 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study to Compare the NexGen CR and CR-Flex Knee Implants
NCT00761956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Metal-backed Versus All-poly
NCT00733928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Postmarketing Study to Determine Performance of the SIGMA HP® PARTIAL KNEE SYSTEM
NCT01529099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RSA RCT: ATTUNE™ TKA Versus PFC Sigma TKA
NCT02256098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of a Metal Backed Fixed-Bearing Tibial Baseplate and an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00979147 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) to Evaluate Fixation of Biofoam Advance Total Knee Arthroplasty Components
NCT00657956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform High-flexion (RP-F) Versus the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform (RP) Knee Implants
NCT00733369 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
I-beam and Cruciate Tibial Components Used in Total Knee Replacement
NCT00588783 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Bone Mineral Density Changes Under Two Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01764984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
NCT01194817 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA