MedTrace Logo

A Comparison Between Signature Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to Conventional TKA and Computer Assisted TKA

NCT01145157 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2017-08-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a prospective, randomised clinical outcomes study comparing the Signature Personalised Patient Care, Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty and Computer Assisted Navigation, using Vanguard Knee System. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TKA using Signature Personalised Patient Care compared to Conventional TKA and Computer Assisted Navigation.

Conditions

  • Joint Disease

Interventions

DEVICE

Signature Knee Guide

Total Knee Arthroplasty performed using Signature Knee Guide

DEVICE

Conventional Instrumentation

Total Knee Arthroplasty performed using Conventional Instrumentation

DEVICE

Computer Assisted Navigation

Total Knee Arthroplasty performed using Computer Assisted Navigation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zimmer Biomet

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Jegan Krishnan · Flinders Medical Centre

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-07-31
Primary Completion
2014-12-31
Completion
2015-02-28

Countries

  • Australia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01145157 on ClinicalTrials.gov