MedTrace Logo

Femoral Versus Radial Access for Primary PCI

NCT01398254 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2292

Last updated 2019-01-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has become the dominant strategy for the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), as studies have shown that PPCI is superior to fibrinolytic therapy. Recent evidence suggests that transradial access (TRA) is superior to transfemoral (TFA) for patients undergoing PPCI. Two large trials report a mortality benefit favouring TRA. The results of these two trials could significantly impact practice guidelines and lead to a recommendation that the approach of choice for primary PCI be radial rather than femoral. This would have significant implications for both PCI centers and interventionalists associated with a large impact on practice and education. Yet, many centers and interventionalists in Canada and in the USA prefer TFA and currently feel pressured in making the change to TRA. With that said, these trials did not include new pharmacotherapy and new technology that would likely have closed or eliminated the gap between TFA and TRA by improving the safety and efficacy of these two approaches. Furthermore, these trials were not powered to conclusively show a mortality benefit. The authors of the two large trials emphasized the need for further trials to confirm the benefits of TRA.

The SAFARI-STEMI trial aims to compare TFA with TRA in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI). The primary outcome will be defined as all cause mortality measured at 30 days. The trial will also evaluate: 1) bleeding events and 2) the composite of death, reinfarction, or stroke defined as major adverse clinical events (MACE). The trial will include the use of antithrombotic therapy with monotherapy, with either bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin; the use of glycoprotein inhibitors IIb/IIIa inhibitors will be avoided. The study will encourage liberal use of vascular closing devices. The trial will also compare delays to reperfusion between the two strategies. Finally, a cost analysis is proposed.

In view of recent publications, there is now a need for a large randomized trial using contemporary adjunct therapies to assess the safety and efficacy of the TRA vs. the TFA in PPCI. The proposed trial aims to conclusively show whether there is a survival benefit associated with the TRA approach.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI)

Participants will be randomly assigned an access site, radial or femoral, for PPCI.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Michel R Le May, MD · Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-07-31
Primary Completion
2018-12-31
Completion
2019-01-16

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01398254 on ClinicalTrials.gov