One-year Outcomes of Electromechanical Activation Time (EMAT)-Guided vs. Symptom-guided Heart Failure Therapy in Acute Heart Failure Syndrome (AHFS) Patients

NCT01298232 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2011-02-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Left ventricular systolic time intervals, including pre-ejection period (PEP), ejection time (ET), and their ratio (PEP/ET), is determined by the systolic and diastolic function and ventriculo-arterial coupling. The investigators have shown the usefulness of the electromechanical activation time (EMAT, equals PEP minus isovolumic contraction time) in the prediction of cardiac mortality or re-hospitalization for heart failure in patients with the acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS). Therefore, the objective of the present proposal is to compare 12-month outcomes of EMAT-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy in patients with AHFS.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Cardiophonogram

Using data from cardiophonogram, the EMAT and S3 intensity, to guided clinical therapy for acute heart failure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-01-31
Primary Completion
2013-12-31
Completion
2013-12-31

Countries

  • Taiwan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01298232 on ClinicalTrials.gov