Mastery Learning Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01085500 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2016-10-28
Summary
Abstract: Minimally invasive techniques are now ubiquitous in the management of surgical disease. Competence in laparoscopy requires specialized training and practice. With the decrease of resident work hours, training programs need to explore and adopt efficient strategies to teach and evaluate laparoscopic skills. For economic, ethical, and legal considerations, the operating room may no longer be the ideal environment for teaching these basic technical skills. There appears to be a role for simulation in response to this need. The transfer of laparoscopic skills learned in a simulated environment to the operating room has showed mixed results. Overall, it seems that surgical skills training outside the operating room is beneficial, but the best method(s) of designing, implementing and evaluating such skills curriculums have yet to be identified.
The laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair is an example of a procedure that is associated with a steep learning curve and requires mastery of basic laparoscopic skills. In addition, an increased recurrence and complication rates in the early learning curve of this procedure, underscores the importance of adequate training. The current practice of teaching the TEP repair in the operating room under an apprenticeship-based model is associated with increased operative time and costs. We propose that the training of surgical trainees outside the operating room with a structured, mastery oriented simulation-based curriculum will help reduce the learning curve of the TEP repair, improve operative performance, and decrease operative time and costs.
Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
Interventions
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Mastery Learning TEP Curriculum
A simulation-based educational curriculum
- PROCEDURE
-
Current Practice
The current practice of learning how to perform the TEP repair in the operating room is under direct supervision of the staff surgeon without any simulation pre-training.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
collaborator NIH - lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
David R Farley, MD · Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2011-01-31
- Completion
- 2011-05-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair.
NCT04211142 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Outcomes Following Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT04578340 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Mesh Position and Outcomes Following Inguinal Hernia Repair Using an MRI Visible Hernia Mesh
NCT02770703 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Inguinal Hernia Management: Watchful Waiting vs. Tension-Free Open Repair
NCT01922674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Mesh-RTL Project, for Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT04134455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh in Incisional Hernia
NCT06197854 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Inguinal Hernia Repair and Male Fertility
NCT05799742 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Surgical Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT00924755 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Does Tension-Free Herniorrhaphy or Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy Achieve Equal or Better Recurrence Rates and Lower Costs While Achieving Equivalent Outcomes for Hernia Patients?
NCT00032448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Suture Repair vs Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia
NCT05599750 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Meshes in Hernia Repair
NCT01090219 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Fixating Mesh Versus Mesh Fixation With Tissue Glue in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06412445 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Prospective Multicenter Study Primary Onlay- Mesh After Elective Median Laparotomy in Patients With BMI ≥ 27
NCT01507870 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT06258317 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Fast-track Surgery in Hernia Repair and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01877824 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectivity of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP) in Daily Clinical Practice - Early and Long-term Results
NCT02561910 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Preperitoneal Umbilical Mesh Area
NCT05576753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Composite Next Generation Tissue Separating Mesh in Laparoscopic Incisional/Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01162564 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
NCT05863624 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair in Liver Transplant Patients
NCT02123719 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Primary Fascial Closure With Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02363790 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Follow-up of Incisional Hernia Repaired With Intraperitoneal Mesh
NCT00891254 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Robotic vs. Conventional Minimal-invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05216276 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Perineal and Abdominal Reconstruction: a Comparison of Reconstructive Methodologies
NCT06800534 ·Status: RECRUITING