Differences in Morbidity Between a Necessity Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol Versus a Routine Endotracheal Suctioning

NCT01069185 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 92

Last updated 2017-09-11

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Morbidity frequency associated to a endotracheal suctioning is different between a necessity endotracheal suctioning protocol versus a routine endotracheal protocol.

Conditions

  • Hypoxemia
  • Arrhythmias
  • Cardiac Arrest
  • Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Necessity endotracheal suctioning

Endotracheal suctioning depends on clinical manifestations

PROCEDURE

Routine endotracheal suctioning

Endotracheal suctioning every two hours

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Gloria L Lema, MD · Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Month
Max Age
14 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-02-28
Primary Completion
2010-08-31
Completion
2010-08-31

Countries

  • Colombia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01069185 on ClinicalTrials.gov