Precise Measurement of Pediatric Defibrillation Thresholds
NCT01043562 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2018-02-05
Summary
Patients who receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) usually undergo testing at the end of the ICD procedure to measure the amount of energy able to successfully defibrillate the heart (defibrillation threshold testing, or DFT). This study proposes to perform that measurement in pediatric patients already undergoing clinically necessary ICD procedures, with the measurement performed using a binary search method that has been previously validated in adult cohorts. We hypothesize that pediatric DFTs, when precisely measured, may be lower than previously assumed from extrapolation of adult data.
Conditions
- Pediatrics
- Defibrillators, Implantable
Interventions
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
Defibrillator threshold testing
Measurement of the defibrillation threshold was performed using a modified binary search protocol. This protocol specified three distinct inductions of ventricular fibrillation (VF) for all subjects, with a 3-5 minute observation/waiting period between inductions. The initial shock energy was programmed at 9 joules (J) for all patients, with internal rescue shocks at 31J followed by device-specific maximum deliverable energy. The outcome of the initial induction determined the programmed energies for both the initial and internal rescue shocks for the second induction, and likewise for the third induction. All shocks were biphasic and delivered at manufacturers' default tilt, polarity and duration, and all final programmed shock vectors included an active can. External defibrillation pads were in place for delivery of external rescue shock should the internal shocks fail.
- OTHER
-
Observation of post-shock intrinsic cardiac rhythm
Prior to each of the three ventricular fibrillation inductions performed as part of the binary search protocol, post-shock pacing was re-programmed using a pre-determined, stepwise protocol that progressively decreased the lower rate limit. For the purpose of this protocol, post-shock pacing was considered necessary if 1) ≥7 ventricular-paced beats or 2) asystole \>4 seconds was observed in the first 20 seconds after defibrillation, or if the systolic blood pressure demonstrated a \>10% decrease from pre-induction baseline at follow-up measurement 1 minute post-defibrillation. Rescue ventricular pacing via the programmer was available for all subjects.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Andrew E Radbill, MD · Boston Children's Hospital
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-06-04
- Primary Completion
- 2010-05-26
- Completion
- 2012-05-10
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Defibrillation Testing During Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Replacement
NCT04206371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating Myocardial Injury for Defibrillation Threshold Testing Methods for ICD Implantation
NCT02111993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Right Ventricular Septal and Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients Receiving a CRT-D Device
NCT00833352 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Epicardial vs. Transvenous ICDs in Children
NCT05349162 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Further Acute Research of a Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator (S-ICD) System
NCT00399217 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Randomized Trial of Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Versus Quarterly Device Interrogations in Clinic
NCT00606567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Automated Cardioverter Defibrillator in Children
NCT00268021 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Trop-Shock DFT-testing Versus None
NCT01230086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Programming Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With Primary Prevention Indication
NCT00743522 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD)/Device Expectations, Adaptations, and Successes Study
NCT01040988 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Feasibility Study on Prediction of an ICD Shock by ICD-derived Data
NCT01822145 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Quick ICD Study: Is Extensive Electrophysiological Testing Before, During and After ICD-Implantation Still Necessary ?
NCT00180362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Interventricular Delay of Lumax HF-T for Heart Failure
NCT00508391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Effect of an Azygos Vein Coil on Defibrillation Threshold
NCT00798174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance GUIDEd Management of Mild-moderate Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.
NCT01918215 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Following Extraction of Conventional ICDs
NCT01665131 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Septal - Success Rate and Clinical Outcome of Septal Implant of Ventricular Defibrillation Lead
NCT00180297 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Investigation of the Medtronic EnTrust™ Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), Model D153ATG
NCT00273195 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CRT Pilot Study for Children With Heart Failure
NCT00585065 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Decision Support for Adults Facing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Pulse Generator Replacement
NCT02668900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Ventilation Detection Via Standard Defibrillator Pads in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients
NCT00628875 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Novel ICD Arrhythmia Detection Algorithm
NCT04981496 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
T-ICD vs S-ICD Shocks: Myocardial Injuries
NCT03458065 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Boston Scientific Post Market Subcutaneous-Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (S-ICD) Registry
NCT01085435 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical and Device Functional Assessment of Real World ICD Patients
NCT02341768 ·Status: COMPLETED