MedTrace Logo

Video-guided Percutaneous Tracheostomy (PCT) Versus Conventional PCT: Comparing Safety and Efficacy

NCT01012518 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2009-11-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the feasibility, safety, efficacy and ease of performance of a video-assisted PCT (via an endotracheal tube embedded with a mini video-camera) with the standard ("blind") PCT technique.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Standard PCT

The standard technique, performed without video guidance

DEVICE

Video-guided PCT

PCT performed with the guidance of a camera-embedded ETT wired to a monitor

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Patrick Sorkine, MD · Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

  • Idit Matot, MD · Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-01-31
Primary Completion
2010-12-31
Completion
2011-02-28

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01012518 on ClinicalTrials.gov