MedTrace Logo

Magnetically Navigated vs. Manually Guided Radiofrequency in Atrioventricular-node-reentry-tachycardia

NCT00875914 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2016-06-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The MAGMA-AVNRT study compares two different methods of handling the ablation catheters for av-node-reentry-tachycardia with regard to x-ray dose, safety and success: manually guided vs magnetically navigated RF-catheter.

Conditions

  • Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia
  • Radiofrequency Ablation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

RF-ablation

4mm-tip catheter manually guided vs magneticallly navigated

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Bergen

    collaborator OTHER

  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Gabi Hessling, MD · Deutsches Herzzentrum München

  • Peter Schuster, MD · University of Bergen

  • Isabel Deisenhofer, MD · Deutsches Herzzentrum München

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-04-30
Primary Completion
2012-03-31
Completion
2012-10-31

Countries

  • Norway

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00875914 on ClinicalTrials.gov