MedTrace Logo

Remote Magnetic Navigation-guided Ablation Versus Cryoablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RECREATION Study)

NCT03044925 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2019-09-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Compare the safety and efficacy of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Conditions

  • Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Remote magnetic navigation

Pulmonary vein isolation and other areas ablation guided by remote magnetic navigation

PROCEDURE

Cryoablation

Pulmonary vein isolation and other areas ablation used by cryoballoon

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ruijin Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Qi Jin, MD · Ruijin Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-11-01
Primary Completion
2020-12-31
Completion
2020-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03044925 on ClinicalTrials.gov