MedTrace Logo

Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation in Refractory Mitral Isthmus-dependent Atrial Flutter: Pulsed Field Ablation Vs. Radiofrequency Ablation: a Preliminary Randomized Controlled Study

NCT06850064 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-02-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation in refractory mitral isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: pulsed field ablation vs. radiofrequency ablation: a preliminary randomized controlled study

Conditions

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pulse Field Ablation (PFA)

The pulse field ablation group will undergo pulse field ablation of the mitral valve commissure.

PROCEDURE

Radiofrequency ablation

In the radiofrequency ablation group, patients will undergo radiofrequency ablation targeted at the mitral valve commissure.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shanghai Chest Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-02-24
Primary Completion
2025-12-01
Completion
2025-12-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06850064 on ClinicalTrials.gov