Ultrabrief Pulsewidth Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)

NCT00870805 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2013-02-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) remains essential to contemporary psychiatric practice and is one of the safest and most effective treatments available for depression. Despite modern advances in pharmacotherapy, about 15-20 per cent of all hospitalised patients receive treatment with ECT. Its use, however, is limited by concerns over associated cognitive side effects.

Recent research has suggested that using an ultrabrief pulsewidth with ECT may greatly reduce cognitive side effects, while maintaining efficacy (Sackeim et al 2008). Preliminary results were positive for unilateral ECT, however, suggest that for bilateral ECT, dosing may need to be adjusted to preserve efficacy while reducing side effects. This study will examine the relative cognitive side effects and efficacy of right unilateral and bilateral ECT given with a standard pulsewidth or an ultrabrief pulsewidth. Some participants will also receive an MRI scan before and after ECT.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

bilateral ultrabrief ECT

Bilateral ECT at 3-4 times seizure threshold with an ultrabrief pulse (0.3ms)

PROCEDURE

bilateral standard ECT

Bilateral ECT with at 1.5 times seizure threshold with a standard pulse (1.0ms)

PROCEDURE

right-unilateral ultrabrief ECT

Right-unilateral ECT at 6 times seizure threshold with an ultrabrief pulse (0.3ms)

PROCEDURE

right-unilateral standard ECT

Right-unilateral ECT with at 5 times seizure threshold with a standard pulse (1.0ms)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Northside Clinic, Australia

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Melbourne Clinic, Australia

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • St George Hospital, Australia

    collaborator OTHER
  • Wandene Private Hospital, Australia

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • The University of New South Wales

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Assoc/Prof Colleen K Loo, MBBS, FRANZCP, MD · University of New South Wales

  • Prof Isaac Schweitzer, MBBS, FRANZCP, MD · The Melbourne Clinic

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-01-31
Primary Completion
2013-01-31
Completion
2013-01-31

Countries

  • Australia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00870805 on ClinicalTrials.gov