Study of Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Urinary Reflux

NCT00830479 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2011-08-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study seeks to compare outcomes after anti-reflux surgery (ARS) for correction of low-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). It is a randomized controlled open-label trial of conventional open anti-reflux technique versus endoscopic anti-reflux technique with injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux). Primary endpoint will be resolution of VUR at initial cystogram after ARS. Secondary outcomes will include incidence of postoperative UTI, resolution of VUR at 1-year cystogram after ARS, surgical complications, and quality of life measures after ARS.

Conditions

  • Vesicoureteral Reflux

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Anti-reflux surgery

Open ureteroneocystostomy for correction of vesicoureteral reflux

PROCEDURE

Endoscopic injection

Endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid gel (Deflux) for correction of vesicoureteral reflux

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
11 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-01-31
Primary Completion
2011-01-31
Completion
2011-01-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00830479 on ClinicalTrials.gov