MedTrace Logo

A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing a Fully-Coated Cementless Stem Versus a Cemented Stem for Total Hip Replacements

NCT00689689 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 48

Last updated 2012-02-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to answer the question as to whether or not a fully coated cementless stem is equal to or better than a cemented stem in patients over 72 years with good bone quality.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Fully coated Prodigy stem

Total hip arthroplasty with fully coated Prodigy stem

DEVICE

Cemented Endurance Stem

total hip arthroplasty with cemented endurance stem

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Nova Scotia Health Authority

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ross K Leighton, MD, FRCS(C) · Capital Health, Canada

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
72 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
1998-07-31
Primary Completion
2009-11-30
Completion
2009-11-30

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00689689 on ClinicalTrials.gov