A Comparison of Two Type of Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00253838 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 39
Last updated 2017-09-25
Summary
This study compares two different hip stem components. Both hip stems used in this study allow the femur bone to attach and grow into them for stability. The main difference between the two stems is that one of the stems, the Solution® Stem, is made from Cobalt Chrome, a type of metal, and does not have a hydroxylapatite (HA) coating, while the second stem included in the study, the Restoration hip stem, is made from titanium alloy, a different type of metal that has a roughened surface and allows for a hydroxylapatite (HA) coating to be applied to the entire length of the stem. The HA coating is a thin calcium phosphate layer on the stem to encourage the bone to grow into it. We are trying to see if there is any difference in the initial bony ingrowth between the two stems and to compare the results in patients over the first two years after the surgery and then again at the five-year period.
Conditions
- Hip Arthroplasty
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Restoration HA stem
The Restoration hip stem, is made from titanium alloy, a different type of metal that has a roughened surfacing and allows for a hydroxylapatite (HA) coating to be applied to the entire length of the stem.
- PROCEDURE
-
Solution stem
The Solution stem is made from Cobalt Chrome, a type of metal, and does not have a hydroxylapatite (HA) coating.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Stryker Nordic
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Paul R Kim, MD, FRCSC · OHRI
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2001-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-09-30
- Completion
- 2012-03-31
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison of Two Metal Surface Finishes on Femoral Components in Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00116038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Small Direct Anterior Incision: The Role of Short Femoral Stem
NCT01614028 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Viability of Short Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02577822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Comparing Ion Levels and Clinical Outcomes of A-Class BFH to Metal on Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement
NCT00911599 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Study Comparing a Short Stem Hip Prosthesis With a Stem of Standard Length
NCT02983526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The 10-year Follow-up of the Delta-TT Trial.
NCT06864897 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Comparison of Two Surface Materials (Tantalum Versus Titanium Fiber Mesh) of Acetabular Components in Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00116051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measured vs Navigated Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05393778 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Metal Ion Serum Concentrations in Patients With Total Hip Replacements
NCT00156598 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
RCT Comparing the DEXA Results of the HA-Omnifit Versus the Symax Uncemented Hip Stem
NCT01695213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems
NCT05815953 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a Short Femoral Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02743208 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Medium and Long Term Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Accolade TMZF Femoral Stem
NCT00951145 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Primary Uncemented Partly Ti-coated Total Hip Prosthesis With and Without HA, and Alumina-on-alumina Articulation
NCT01118247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Importance of Hollow or Solid Centralizer for Polished, Collarless and Tapered Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01918540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of a Short Uncemented Femoral Stem to a Similar Standard Uncemented Femoral Stem
NCT03500926 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigating the Direct Superior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty as an Effective Alternative to Traditional Posterior Approach
NCT03227549 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Metal-metal Articulations Versus Standard 28 mm Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01113762 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Corin Tri-Fit Total Hip Replacement
NCT02162186 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
An MRI Investigation of Soft Tissues in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01750606 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Effectiveness of the HIT Reverse HRS
NCT05357378 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Component Design and Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03272178 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
An Assessment of 4 Different Bearing Types in Hip Replacement Types to Analsye the Lowest Wear Rates of Polyethylene
NCT03900039 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of the SL PLUS and the SL PLUS MIA Hip Stem
NCT01435850 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Fitmore Versus CLS Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Bilateral One-stage Operations
NCT03112785 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA