Treatment of Periodontitis Using Er:YAG Laser vs. Conventional Treatment Modalities

NCT00669253 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2014-12-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment, that is, root debridement using manual and ultrasonic means at baseline and surgery using the same means after 6 months in case of persistent deep pockets (Group 1)/ Er:YAG laser used in a non-surgical approach at baseline and surgery using the same laser after 6 months in case of persistent deep pockets (Group 2)/ Surgery at baseline using manual and ultrasonic means (Group 3). All patients will undergo supragingival maintenance on a yearly basis.

Conditions

  • Chronic Periodontitis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Er: YAG Laser

Scaling and root planing at baseline and surgery for remaining deep pockets after 6 months both using Er:YAG laser

PROCEDURE

Conventional treatment 1(ultrasonic and manual means)

Scaling and root planing at baseline and surgery for remaining deep pockets after 6 months both using conventional methods : ultrasonic and manual means

PROCEDURE

Conventional treatment 2 (ultrasonic and manual means)

Surgery at baseline for all deep pockets using conventional methods: ultrasonic and manual means

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Ghent

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hugo De Bruyn, MD, Phd · University Hospital, Ghent

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
35 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-06-30
Primary Completion
2010-12-31
Completion
2012-12-31

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00669253 on ClinicalTrials.gov