Standard Reaming Versus Reaming/Irrigating/Aspirating for Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures

NCT00534326 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 158

Last updated 2020-03-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Reaming (enlarging of the bone canal) is commonly performed prior to the insertion of intramedullary nails for the fixation of long bone fractures. This study is designed to compare the union rates between fractures reamed by standard reaming versus reaming with a Reamer/Irrigator/ Aspirator (RIA). In addition, this study will collect patient-based outcomes on these patients. Little information exists on the patient based outcomes following femur fractures. We hope that the patient based outcomes of this study will also be able to aid physicians in advising patients with femur fractures of their possible outcomes.

Conditions

  • Femoral Fractures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Standard Reaming

Femoral reaming using standard reaming techniques of multiple reamers

PROCEDURE

Reaming/Irrigating/Aspirating

Reaming using the Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirating

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Missouri-Columbia

    collaborator OTHER
  • Prisma Health-Upstate

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kyle J Jeray, MD · Prisma Health-Upstate

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-12-31
Primary Completion
2015-12-31
Completion
2018-12-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00534326 on ClinicalTrials.gov