Comparison Between LISS Plating and Intramedullary (IM) Nailing for Supracondylar Femur Fractures

NCT00578019 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2013-10-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare patient outcomes for the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) (Synthes {USA}, Paoli, PA, USA), a minimally invasive plating system used in the treatment of supracondylar femur fractures, with patient outcomes for the Supracondylar Nail (Smith \& Nephew Inc, Memphis, TN, USA), a retrograde intramedullary nail.

Conditions

  • Supracondylar Femur Fracture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

IM Nailing

Patients randomized to Arm 1, A will be treated with a retrograde intramedullary nailing of the femur fracture utilizing the Smith \& Nephew supracondylar nail.

PROCEDURE

LISS

Group B patients will have their fracture stabilized with the LISS plates (Synthes \[USA\], Paoli, PA, USA).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • James P Stannard, MD · The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
1999-12-31
Primary Completion
2005-05-31
Completion
2005-05-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00578019 on ClinicalTrials.gov