Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Trial

NCT00233324 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1316

Last updated 2019-04-18

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

This study compared the use of continuous positive airway pressure initiated at birth with the early administration of surfactant administered through a tube in the windpipe within 1 hour of birth for premature infants born at 24 to 27 weeks gestation. In addition, these infants within 2 hours of birth, had a special pulse oximeter placed to continuously monitor their oxygen saturation in two different target ranges (85-89% or 91-95%). This study helped determine whether or not these two management strategies affect chronic lung disease and survival of premature infants.

Conditions

  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases
  • Other Preterm Infants
  • Infant, Small for Gestational Age
  • Premature Birth
  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity

Interventions

DRUG

Surfactant

Intubation and administration of surfactant by 1 hour of age.

DEVICE

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/Positive End Expiratory Pressure (CPAP/PEEP) begun in the delivery room and continuing in the NICU

DRUG

Supplemental oxygen with target saturation of 85 to 89%

Supplemental oxygen in the range of 85% to 89% until the infant is no longer requiring ventilatory support or oxygen

DRUG

Supplemental oxygen with target saturation of 91 to 95%

Supplemental oxygen in the range of 91% to 95% until the infant is no longer requiring ventilatory support or oxygen.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

    collaborator NIH
  • National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)

    collaborator NIH
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

    collaborator NIH
  • NICHD Neonatal Research Network

    lead NETWORK

Principal Investigators

  • Abbot R. Laptook, MD · Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

  • Michele C. Walsh, MD MS · Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital

  • Ronald N. Goldberg, MD · Duke University

  • Barbara J. Stoll, MD · Emory University

  • Brenda B. Poindexter, MD MS · Indiana University

  • Abhik Das, PhD · RTI International

  • Krisa P. Van Meurs, MD · Stanford University

  • Ivan D. Frantz III, MD · Tufts Medical Center

  • Neil N. Finer, MD · University of California, San Diego

  • Kurt Schibler, MD · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

  • Waldemar A. Carlo, MD · University of Alabama at Birmingham

  • Edward F. Bell, MD · University of Iowa

  • Kristi L. Watterberg, MD · University of New Mexico

  • Pablo J. Sanchez, MD · University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

  • Kathleen A. Kennedy, MD MPH · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

  • Roger G. Faix, MD · University of Utah

  • Seetha Shankaran, MD · Wayne State University

  • Richard A. Ehrenkranz, MD · Yale University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
24 Weeks
Max Age
27 Weeks
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2005-02-28
Primary Completion
2009-02-28
Completion
2016-08-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00233324 on ClinicalTrials.gov