The IMAP Study Improving Management of Mildly Abnormal Pap Smears

NCT00119509 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2007-04-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study compares the psychosocial outcomes of different management strategies for women with minor atypia (including 'HPV effect') detected on Pap smears: conventional management (a repeat Pap smear at 6 months) versus Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, a new method proposed for the management of minor atypia and the informed choice of either management supported by a decision aid.

The study examines women's informed preferences for each of these options and compares the psychosocial outcomes in women who are or are not given the choice of management.

HPV DNA testing offers considerable changes to the management of women with minor atypia and there is evidence from the USA which suggests that the use of HPV DNA testing as a triage strategy is effective for women within this group (Solomon et al 2001). The introduction of HPV DNA testing may bring both benefits and harms to women. These harms and benefits are not well understood. Examination of the psychosocial outcomes of HPV DNA testing compared to conventional management and women's preferences for each is needed to guide decisions concerning HPV DNA testing in cervical screening in Australia and also internationally.

Conditions

  • Cervix Neoplasms

Interventions

PROCEDURE

HPV DNA testing

PROCEDURE

Conventional management (repeat Pap smear at 6 months)

PROCEDURE

Decision aid with choice of management

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia

    collaborator OTHER
  • Family Planning Association New South Wales

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • University of Sydney

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kirsten McCaffery, PhD · University of Sydney

  • Les Irwig, PhD · University of Sydney

  • Glenn Salkeld, PhD · University of Sydney

  • Alexandra Barratt, PhD · University of Sydney

  • Kirsten Howard, Masters · University of Sydney

  • Edith Weisberg, Medicine · Family Planning Association

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2004-01-31
Completion
2008-04-30

Countries

  • Australia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00119509 on ClinicalTrials.gov