MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Performing V-Notes Hysterectomy Under Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia

NCT07758504 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28

Last updated 2026-08-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery is recognized as a significant advancement in women's health, representing an extension of minimally invasive surgery. Research and clinical experience with this technique are ongoing, contributing to its increasing adoption as a suitable option for a broader patient population.

The aim of this study is to evaluate vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy performed under general anesthesia versus regional anesthesia in terms of surgical comfort, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and other relevant clinical outcomes, as well as to compare patients' recovery times.

Conditions

  • Hysterectomy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Vnotes hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia

V-notes hysterectomy performed under spinal anesthesia according to the study protocol

PROCEDURE

Vnotes hysterectomy under general anesthesia

V-notes hysterectomy performed under general anesthesia according to the study protocol

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cukurova University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-07-14
Primary Completion
2027-10-10
Completion
2027-10-10

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07758504 on ClinicalTrials.gov