High vs. Low Segmental Hysterotomy: Impact on Uterine Wall Defects Post-Cesarean
NCT06620432 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 168
Last updated 2026-05-07
Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the incidence of defects in the uterine wall at the site of the scar (niche) and surgical complications when using high-segment versus low-segment hysterotomy, with both cross-suturing and non-cross-suturing techniques, in pregnant patients undergoing their first cesarean section.
Researchers will compare four arms:
* Low Segment Hysterotomy + Crossed hysterorrhaphy
* High Segment Hysterotomy + Crossed hysterorrhaphy
* Low Segment Hysterotomy + Non-Crossed hysterorrhaphy
* High Segment Hysterotomy + Non-Crossed hysterorrhaphy
Participants will:
* Cesarean delivery
* Attend a follow up appointment between 6 to 16 weeks post surgery where will be perform a transvaginal sonography.
Conditions
- Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Non-Crossed hysterorrhaphy
Non-crossed hysterorrhaphy is a surgical technique used to close a uterine incision, typically after a hysterotomy, such as during a cesarean section. In this method, the sutures are placed in a linear, parallel fashion rather than in a crossed or X-shaped pattern
- PROCEDURE
-
Crossed hysterorrhaphy
Crossed hysterorrhaphy is a surgical technique used to close the uterine incision following a hysterotomy, particularly during cesarean sections. In this method, the sutures are placed in a crossed or X-shaped pattern, which helps to evenly distribute tension across the incision site.
- PROCEDURE
-
High segment hysterotomy
A high segment hysterotomy is a surgical procedure involving an incision in the upper segment of the uterus.
- PROCEDURE
-
Low segment hysterotomy
A low segment hysterotomy is a surgical procedure in which an incision is made in the lower segment of the uterus, typically during a cesarean section or other uterine surgeries. This approach is preferred because the lower uterine segment is thinner and less vascular, reducing the risk of bleeding and complications during and after the procedure. The incision is typically horizontal.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Albaro J. Nieto, M.D. · Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-06-12
- Primary Completion
- 2026-11-30
- Completion
- 2027-08-31
Countries
- Colombia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Surgical Approach to Uterine Septum
NCT06315582 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Hysterotomy Technique on the Rate of Large Defects in the Hysterotomy Scar
NCT01091181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Combined Laparoscopic and Hysteroscopic Repair of CS Niche
NCT05777837 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes on Abdominal Versus Vaginal Morcellation At Time of Hysterectomy
NCT04434066 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single or Double-layer Uterine Closure Techniques
NCT03629028 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Study of Uterine Incision Diverticulum Repair vs. no Repair During Second/Third Cesarean Section
NCT06612957 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Vertical Versus Horizontal Vaginal Cuff Closure on Vaginal Length After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02276261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Histerectomy Vs Partial Myometrial Resection for Placenta Accreta Spectrum
NCT05013749 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extra - Abdominal Versus Intra - Abdominal Repair of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section
NCT02373501 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Salpingectomy Techniques for Sterilization at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
NCT06273683 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Hysteroscopic Septoplasty by Different Modalities
NCT05802784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Learning Curves for Two Different Techniques in Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT06220253 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Hysteroscopy and Transvaginal Surgery on Reproductive Prognosis in Patients With Post Cesarean Scar Defect
NCT04096677 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Multicentre Trial of Nerve-Spring Radical Hysterectomy vs. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
NCT01886508 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Uterine Cavity After Operative Hysteroscopy
NCT06924437 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
The Efficacy of a Temporary Sub-Placental Uterine Tourniquet in Minimizing Intraoperative Blood Loss in Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder by a Retrograde Cesarean Hysterectomy (Bladder Last)
NCT05936645 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Association Between Surgical Timing and Route of Total Hysterectomy After LEEP and Perioperative Risk in Patients With Cervical HSIL
NCT06325592 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Presumably Early Stage Cervical Cancer: a Retrospective Multicenter Non-inferiority Study Comparing Overall and Progression-free Survival.
NCT07120529 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Uterine Repair Surgery on Preventing Recurrence of Cesarean Sar Pregnancy
NCT06485180 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Barbed vs Standard Suture for Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Closure
NCT03038945 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal NOTES Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT04886791 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Perioperative Outcomes of Common Methods of Minimally Invasive Contained Tissue Extraction
NCT02496130 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Tissue Removal During Hysterectomy: The Effect of Vaginal Versus Abdominal Morcellation on Surgical Outcomes
NCT02703246 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hysteroscopic "Hot Knife" and "Cold Knife" in the Treatment of the Intrauterine Adhesion
NCT04936347 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer
NCT01258413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3