MedTrace Logo

Pre-Visit AI Symptom-Checking and Shared Decision-Making in Spine Physical Therapy

NCT07733752 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2026-07-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) symptom-checking tools, including large language models such as ChatGPT, are increasingly used by patients before they seek care. These tools may shape patients' beliefs about their diagnosis, how serious they think their condition is, and when they decide to seek treatment. It is not yet known how this pre-visit AI use affects the initial physical therapy encounter for spine-related problems.

This prospective observational cohort study examines whether prior use of AI symptom-checking tools influences the first physical therapy evaluation in adults presenting with spine-related musculoskeletal complaints (neck, thoracic, or low back pain, with or without radicular symptoms). Consecutive patients attending an outpatient physical therapy clinic for a new evaluation are grouped as AI users or non-AI users based on whether they used such a tool for their current complaint in the previous 30 days.

The primary outcome is shared decision-making, measured with the SDM-Q-9 immediately after the initial evaluation. Secondary outcomes include stage of presentation, agreement between the patient's expected diagnosis and the clinician's classification, baseline pain and disability, functional performance, and clinical outcomes at 2 and 6 weeks. The investigators hypothesize that prior AI use is associated with differences in shared decision-making and in how patients present for care.

Conditions

  • Low Back Pain
  • Neck Pain
  • Radiculopathy

Interventions

OTHER

re-visit AI symptom-checker use

Self-reported use of an AI-based symptom-checking tool (e.g., a large language model such as ChatGPT) for the current spine-related complaint during the 30 days before the initial physical therapy evaluation. This exposure occurs naturally prior to presentation and is not assigned by the investigator. Exposure status is ascertained at baseline via a questionnaire capturing whether AI was used (yes/no), the type of tool, frequency of use, degree of personalization, and the reported influence of AI use on care-seeking timing.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-06-10
Primary Completion
2026-12-10
Completion
2027-02-10

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07733752 on ClinicalTrials.gov