Comparison of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Conventional Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in Grade II and III Hemorrhoids

NCT07678814 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 96

Last updated 2026-07-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common anorectal disorders. Conventional Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy remains the standard treatment but is associated with considerable postoperative pain. Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. This randomized controlled trial compares postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and hospital stay between Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and conventional hemorrhoidectomy in patients with Grade II and Grade III hemorrhoids.

Conditions

  • Hemorrhoids Second Degree
  • Hemorrhoids Third Degree
  • Internal Hemorrhoids

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty

Patients randomized to the intervention group underwent Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty under spinal anesthesia. A diode laser probe was introduced into the hemorrhoidal tissue through a small mucosal entry point under direct visualization using an anoscope. Controlled laser energy was delivered submucosally to achieve coagulation, shrinkage, and fixation of the hemorrhoidal cushions while preserving the surrounding anoderm and mucosa. The procedure was performed according to standard surgical protocols with the aim of reducing postoperative pain, bleeding, and recovery time.

PROCEDURE

Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy

Patients randomized to the control group underwent conventional open Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia. The hemorrhoidal pedicles were identified, ligated, and excised using standard surgical techniques. The wounds were left open with preservation of mucocutaneous bridges between excision sites. Hemostasis was achieved as required. Patients received routine postoperative care and follow-up according to institutional protocols.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Allama Iqbal Medical College

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-09-01
Primary Completion
2026-02-28
Completion
2026-03-31

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07678814 on ClinicalTrials.gov